Teams

Ma.Harris18A

2025 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.21 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-05-04vs Je.Komes183.0Split 11
L#1 SinglesSally Highsmith vs Keisha Demps2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAnna Goodmon / Blake Fricks vs AMY KOCH / Kristen Duke6-2, 6-3
2025-04-27vs Je.SagalSolomon18AWon 21
W#1 DoublesMaryKate Harris / Anna Goodmon vs Kelly Kelly / McGavock Edwards6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSally Highsmith vs Crystal Beard6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKristen Patch / Laura Roach vs Michele Nowicki / Helen Michaels4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-04-16vs Ju.Brown18ALost 12
L#1 SinglesSally Highsmith vs Veronica Glass6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBlake Fricks / Anna Goodmon vs Amy Cagle / Emily Rubin2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesKristen Patch vs Kate Rigsbee6-3, 6-0
2025-04-16vs La.McRee18AWon 20
W#1 SinglesSally Highsmith vs Heath Hilliker6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAnna Goodmon / Blake Fricks vs Miriam Waters / Michelle Metelo6-1, 7-5
2025-04-13vs Am.Cuni18AWon 20
W#1 SinglesSally Highsmith vs Melissa Rini6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKristen Patch / Sheri Erhart vs Amanda Shelton / Jody Mahoney4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-03-29vs La.Holderness18ALost 02
L#1 SinglesKristen Patch vs Chandler Boneham1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMaryKate Harris / Sheri Erhart vs Melissa Cleary / Lisa McDermott6-7, 0-6
2025-03-23vs Me.Gill18ALost 12
L#1 DoublesCourtney Grinnell / Rebecca Anderson vs Hayley Cain - (DQ) / Caroline Smith2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesSally Highsmith vs Catie Cunningham6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesKristen Patch vs Julia Bethune6-7, 6-0, 0-1
2025-03-09vs Ja.Bolton-Cubillan18AWon 20
W#1 SinglesSally Highsmith vs Michelle Mills6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBlake Fricks / Anna Goodmon vs Vanessa Treires / Azariah Bell6-0, 6-1
2025-03-02vs Pa.Spell18ALost 12
L#1 DoublesChase Felmet / Hayley Cain - (DQ) vs Donna Driscoll / Louise Hutchinson6-7, 6-0, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSally Highsmith vs Meghan OFerral6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKristen Patch / Sheri Erhart vs Kimberlei Gill / Pamela Spell5-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Sally Highsmith
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.40
Hayley Cain
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Chase Felmet
published 3.5
3.00
Lauren Bean
published
2.98
Anna Goodmon
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Blake Fricks
published 3
2.75
Kristen Patch
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.58
Sheri Erhart
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.56
MaryKate Harris
published
2.42
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chase Felmet + Hayley Cain6060% games+13.6% vs expected
Kristen Patch + Sally Highsmith27567% games+6.7% vs expected
Kristen Patch + Anna Goodmon6355% games+2.9% vs expected
Sheri Erhart + Kristen Patch2350% gamesnot enough data
Sally Highsmith + Hayley Cain213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Sally Highsmith
159W–46L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%74%25%
3.41
3.5
Hayley Cain
22W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
3.5
Chase Felmet
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Lauren Bean
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Anna Goodmon
76W–41L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Blake Fricks
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Kristen Patch
80W–63L career · 6 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.75
3
Sheri Erhart
18W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
MaryKate Harris
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
34%65%<1%
2.56
Margaret Ann Kleisch
0W–8L career · no lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.