Teams

3 Woodlake Patterson

2023 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.38 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-04vs 7 ACAC JohnstonLost 02
L#1 DoublesKen Patterson / Chris Grinnell vs Michael Cable / Joseph Braud4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesTommy Bader / Edward Moss vs Jimmy Ghaphery / Scott Kim3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-06-03vs 6 Willow Oaks PerronLost 01
L#2 SinglesTommy Bader vs Christopher Dooley1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-05-21vs 5 Ridgetop LefkowitzLost 01
L#3 DoublesTommy Bader / Michael Cabral vs William Pilc / David Lefkowitz4-6, 1-6
2023-05-13vs 2 MRTC Battery Park SpivackSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBradley Glen / Chris Grinnell vs John Bennett / Wayne Motley6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesTommy Bader vs Tucker Ottaway2-6, 2-6
2023-05-07vs 8 Morgan's Stand at James RiverLost 01
L#1 DoublesEric Estes / Tommy Bader vs Brian Rowe / Alan Cannaday4-6, 0-6
2023-04-23vs 4 Westwood GodseyLost 01
L#3 DoublesTommy Bader / Wieslaw Gumulak vs Richard Godsey / Ben Hall2-6, 2-6
2023-04-16vs 1 Richmond 4.5 TennisbumsLost 01
L#1 DoublesChris Grinnell / Drew Lineberger vs Sean Stewart / Andrew Freeman6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andrew Novak
published 4.5
Bradley Glen
published 4.5
4.08
Renato Mendoza
published
4.06
Chris Grinnell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.04
Eric Estes
published
3.85
Tommy Bader
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.77
Mikhil Sanduria
published
3.74
Ken Patterson
published
3.73
Michael Cabral
published
3.69
Wieslaw Gumulak
published
3.56
Edward Moss
published
Drew Lineberger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wieslaw Gumulak + Ken Patterson134 matchesnot enough data
Wieslaw Gumulak + Chris Grinnell033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andrew Novak
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Bradley Glen
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Renato Mendoza
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
27%72%<1%
4.08
4.5
Chris Grinnell
75W–55L career · 3 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
4.06
Eric Estes
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
4.04
4
Tommy Bader
115W–143L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%86%14%
3.85
Mikhil Sanduria
21W–12L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
Ken Patterson
11W–8L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
Michael Cabral
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%2%
3.73
Wieslaw Gumulak
8W–19L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
Edward Moss
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
Drew Lineberger
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.