Teams

CSCC DAVIS

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - SOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-09-05vs CSRC BRENNERSplit 11
W#1 DoublesColleen Miller / Maira Lillybridge vs Shawnee Brenner / Jennifer Tanner6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesSherri Butler vs Joy Carroll3-6, 4-6
2026-08-31vs LTFCS SHAINKLost 02
L#1 DoublesMaira Lillybridge / Colleen Miller vs Jane Glimco / Amy Sauerland6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLisa Smith / Sherri Butler vs Hannah Geiger / Judi Ashmen1-6, 0-6
2026-08-17vs CCW SCOTTLost 02
L#1 SinglesMaira Lillybridge vs Stacy Mills1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKris Quinones / Diane Wilborn vs Callie Scott / Margaret Hill1-6, 0-6
2026-08-10vs FHCS CUSTINELost 12
L#1 DoublesColleen Miller / Trudi Jackson vs Beth Scutellaro / Ashley Boehm0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSherri Butler vs Jessica Daniels1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKris Quinones / Diane Wilborn vs Lorna Gutierrez / Barbara Francklyn3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-08-03vs FLYHS CLAWSONSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTrudi Jackson / Colleen Miller vs Tara Clawson / Megghan St Aubyn7-6, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKris Quinones / Maira Lillybridge vs Sarah Vanderbeck / Ann Smith2-6, 4-6
2026-07-27vs CCOC DODDLost 02
L#1 DoublesJulie Davis / Maira Lillybridge vs Irene Larimer / Michelle Erlander2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesSherri Butler vs Christie Lee6-7, 3-6
2026-07-20vs CCOC BONICELLILost 01
L#2 DoublesDiane Wilborn / Sherri Butler vs Jenisha Bonicelli / Erica Hoffman3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CCOC DODD40102561
2LTFCS SHAINK40102767
3CCOC ROSS40841086
4CCOC BONICELLI3184883
5AFA HAMMER227512101
6FHCS CUSTINE226613104
7MEMPK VIERA226616117
8BRDMR DOMANGUE12541083
9CSCC DAVIS133919126

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.49 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Trudi Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Maira Lillybridge
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.45
Sherri Butler
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.32
Diane Wilborn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.19
Kris Quinones
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Trudi Jackson
26W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
2.87
Maira Lillybridge
15W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.60
Sherri Butler
11W–40L career · 5 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.45
3
Diane Wilborn
14W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026
91%9%<1%
2.32
Kris Quinones
9W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
2.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.