Teams

Winter Haven City Racquettes - G. Tardy

Polk Casual League · Polk Ladies Casual Play Fall

10 players · average NTRP 3.12 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2022-11-29Won 10
W#3 DoublesLisa Pearce / Christina Beissinger vs Barbara Losch / Sue Schultz6-0, 6-2
2022-11-15Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Pearce / Christina Beissinger vs Jan Borden / Svetlana Darrow0-6, 1-6
2022-11-08vs Beerman - T. LoveLost 01
L#3 DoublesLisa Pearce / Vanessa Barfield vs Tiffany Choe / Rosa Jean1-6, 1-6
2022-10-25Lost 01
L#4 DoublesLisa Pearce / Danielle Miller vs Catie Kincaid / Leilani Guinn2-6, 2-6
2022-10-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesMandy Jarrett / Lisa Pearce vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-10-04Won 10
W#3 DoublesMandy Jarrett / Lisa Pearce vs Elaine Bishop / Freda Vincent6-3, 6-3
2022-09-20vs Beerman - T. LoveLost 01
L#3 DoublesChristina Beissinger / Lisa Pearce vs Tiffany Choe / Rosa Jean4-6, 1-6
2022-09-13Won 10
W#4 DoublesChristina Beissinger / Lisa Pearce vs Hilary Crenshaw / Courtney Phillips4-0
2022-08-30Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLisa Pearce / Christina Beissinger vs Brittany Ward / Leilani Guinn2-6, 4-6
2022-08-23Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLisa Pearce / Kim Schmucker vs Angie Shoemaker / Jihyeon Choe1-6, 2-6
2022-08-16Won 10
W#4 DoublesLisa Pearce / Christina Beissinger vs Clara Copley / Tori Hogg6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Polk Ladies Casual Play Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Marcia Whitney
published 3.5
3.10
Lana Dinnwiddie
published
3.00
Mandy Jarrett
published 3
2.90
Geraldine Tardy
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.86
Jenilee Coconato
published
2.80
2.76
Lisa Pearce
usually #3 Doubles 64%, also #4 Doubles 27% · published
2.60
Vanessa Barfield
published
2.49
Kim Schmucker
published
Mary Stine
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Geraldine Tardy + Marcia Whitney4447% games+10.4% vs expected
Marcia Whitney + Mandy Jarrett7554% games+5.8% vs expected
Geraldine Tardy + Mandy Jarrett4452% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Marcia Whitney
61W–80L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
Lana Dinnwiddie
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
3
Mandy Jarrett
73W–46L career · no lines in 2022
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Geraldine Tardy
102W–114L career · 16 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
2.90
Jenilee Coconato
8W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Catherine Mueller
26W–27L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
Lisa Pearce
13W–22L career · 11 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
Vanessa Barfield
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
2.60
Kim Schmucker
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
0%53%47%
2.49
Mary Stine
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.