Teams

Ga.Fye40S

2024 Capital Singles 40 & Over · 3.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-27vs An.Collicutt40SSplit 11
L#1 SinglesJohn Glowiak vs Charles King3-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesGregory Knowles vs William Santa Rosa6-2, 6-3
2024-07-20vs Jo.Allessio40SSplit 11
W#2 SinglesGary Fye vs Thomas Beck7-6, 6-4
L#3 SinglesJohn Glowiak vs Paul Shimp7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2024-07-13vs Ro.Burns40SLost 01
L#2 SinglesTravis Holshouser vs Alan Callahan6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-07-06vs Ro.Harris40SSplit 11
W#1 SinglesTravis Holshouser vs PEDRO J LEON6-3, 6-3
L#3 SinglesGary Fye vs Robert Harris2-6, 3-6
2024-06-18vs An.Collicutt40SLost 01
L#2 SinglesJohn Glowiak vs Rick Lowe2-6, 3-6
2024-06-15Lost 01
L#3 SinglesGary Fye vs Thomas Beck4-6, 6-7
2024-06-08vs Ro.Burns40SWon 10
W#2 SinglesGregory Knowles vs Alan Callahan3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-06-01vs Ro.Harris40SWon 10
W#2 SinglesGregory Knowles vs Patrick Dougherty6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Travis Holshouser
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.48
Frederick Sefcovic
published
3.44
Britton Williams
published 3.5
3.43
Mike Uhland
published
3.25
Gregory Knowles
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Gary Fye
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Harrison Edwards
published
2.96
John Glowiak
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.90
Dave Hunt
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gary Fye + Travis Holshouser16168% gamesnot enough data
Gregory Knowles + Gary Fye4546% gamesnot enough data
Britton Williams + Travis Holshouser5167% gamesnot enough data
Frederick Sefcovic + Gary Fye213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Travis Holshouser
122W–29L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%26%74%
3.59
Frederick Sefcovic
7W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Britton Williams
16W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
Mike Uhland
23W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.43
3.5
Gregory Knowles
82W–52L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Gary Fye
166W–105L career · 3 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
Harrison Edwards
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.08
3
John Glowiak
48W–36L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
2.96
3
Dave Hunt
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
2.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.