Teams

RMcGarrah-HR

2026 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Men Evening

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-30vs CGilley-CHCCWon 20
W#1 SinglesMark Fossum vs Sammy Myers6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesBrian Reo vs Lucas Beal6-0, 6-3
2026-06-23vs JByrd-DURWon 21
W#1 SinglesCaleb Kent vs Blake Jensen6-0, 7-5
L#2 SinglesBrian Reo vs Andrew Hedgpeth1-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesRob McGarrah vs Barry Gitarts6-1, 6-3
2026-06-16vs BKing-DURWon 30
W#1 SinglesCaleb Kent vs Pablo Araya6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesBrian Reo vs David Jackson6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesMark Fossum vs Harrison Bailey6-1, 6-1
2026-06-09vs SBurger-DURWon 20
W#2 SinglesCaleb Kent vs Alex Stoffregen6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesMark Fossum vs Steven Burger6-3, 6-2
2026-06-02vs CLynch-DURWon 21
W#1 SinglesCaleb Kent vs Conor Lynch6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesMatt Williamson vs Matthew Feldt0-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesMark Fossum vs Kobi Talma4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-05-26vs GHigh-DURWon 21
W#1 SinglesCaleb Kent vs Graham High6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMark Fossum vs Kevin McCarty6-4, 6-1
L#3 SinglesMatt Williamson vs Will Clark3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-05-12vs RSamulski-CHTCWon 20
W#1 SinglesRob McGarrah vs Kellette Wade6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesMark Fossum vs Grant Richter6-0, 6-0
2026-05-05vs CYang-DURSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMark Fossum vs Bokang Zhou2-6, 5-7
W#3 SinglesCaleb Kent vs Chang Yang6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Caleb Kent
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3
3.09
Mark Fossum
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.08
Brian Reo
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.99
Rob McGarrah
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.85
Matt Williamson
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Caleb Kent
20W–8L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
<1%6%94%
3.22
Mark Fossum
25W–12L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.09
Brian Reo
16W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.08
3
Rob McGarrah
70W–45L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99
Matt Williamson
5W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.