Teams

WNCA McAndrews (Peachtree)

Combo 55 & Over USTA WNC 2024 · WNC Combo 55 & Over 6.5 Women - Tuesday

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-09-24vs WNCC Bull (HRC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesKelly Emoff / Melissa Coles vs TLynn Gilpin / Karen Watson7-5, 6-2
2024-09-21vs WNCP McClurkin (HRC)Won 10
W#3 DoublesKelly Emoff / Mary Livesay vs Donna Remenar / Donna Andres6-1, 6-2
2024-08-20vs WNCM Wiener (ARC S)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMelissa Coles / Kelly Emoff vs Merle Arcand / Holly Roe6-2, 6-3
2024-08-06vs WNCL Gilpin (HRC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMelissa Coles / Kelly Emoff vs JoAnne Dougher / Amy Eskew7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WNC Combo 55 & Over 6.5 Women - Tuesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Mary Livesay
published
3.26
Christine Allan
published 3.5
3.25
Kelly Emoff
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Melissa Coles
published
3.18
Alice Robbins
published 3.5
3.01
Wanda Page
published
3.00
Ronda Champion
published
2.82
Donna Connell
published
2.74
Ann McAndrews
published 3
2.61
2.41
Debra Abrams
published 3
Jane Alexander Bell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ronda Champion + Wanda Page3448% games−0.3% vs expected
Melissa Coles + Mary Livesay6650% games−0.4% vs expected
Betty Hollingsworth + Wanda Page2544% games−3.4% vs expected
Ann McAndrews + Christine Allan2353% gamesnot enough data
Betty Hollingsworth + Ann McAndrews044 matchesnot enough data
Betty Hollingsworth + Debra Abrams044 matchesnot enough data
Betty Hollingsworth + Ronda Champion213 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Coles + Kelly Emoff303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Livesay
15W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Christine Allan
10W–14L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Kelly Emoff
61W–53L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Melissa Coles
25W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%6%94%
3.22
3.5
Alice Robbins
10W–15L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Wanda Page
5W–12L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.01
Ronda Champion
8W–13L career · no lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.00
Donna Connell
0W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Ann McAndrews
7W–19L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.74
3
Betty Hollingsworth
6W–21L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
2.61
3
Debra Abrams
0W–16L career · no lines in 2024
73%27%<1%
2.41
Jane Alexander Bell
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.