Teams

Hot Shots

NORTHERN Adult 18 & Over Winter · 2.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.83 / DELAWARE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-02-24vs Good Get GirlsWon 21
L#1 DoublesVicki Cheng / Ashley Yu vs Lynn Calder / Kathleen Leach2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesElisabeth Posthill vs Meaghan Drummond7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJane Zhou / Telsche Marino vs Isabelle Farrell / Susan Snodgrass6-4, 7-5
2023-01-28vs Good Get GirlsWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarol Looby / Vicki Cheng vs Tina Dougherty / Mercedes Migliore6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesYan Burger vs Kristine Lisi4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTelsche Marino / Jane Zhou vs Martha Yates / Frances Schoonover6-2, 6-2
2023-01-21vs Slice GirlsWon 30
W#1 DoublesXiaoming Ma / Ashley Yu vs Nicole Stanton / Adria Stella6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesCarol Looby vs Daniela Heredia6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesElisabeth Posthill / Kalina Doytchinova-Weil vs Mary Russell / Sandra Wood Wermus7-5, 6-2
2023-01-14vs Volley LlamasWon 21
W#1 DoublesYan Burger / Telsche Marino vs Kerry Doyle-Shannon / Iwona Jakubowski6-4, 6-0
L#1 SinglesVicki Cheng vs Lizz Hubbs6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesXiaoming Ma / Kalina Doytchinova-Weil vs Cheryl Cox / Mary MacAllister6-3, 6-0
2022-12-10vs Slice GirlsLost 12
L#1 DoublesPaula Baker / Kalina Doytchinova-Weil vs Daniela Heredia / Christine Ulrich1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesXiaoming Ma vs Willa Carr7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJane Zhou / Elisabeth Posthill vs Stephanie McConaghy / Sarah Stroh5-7, 4-6
2022-12-03vs Volley LlamasWon 20
W#1 DoublesCarol Looby / Paula Baker vs Kerry Doyle-Shannon / Linda Mionske6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesElisabeth Posthill vs Katherine Plemmons6-2, 6-1
2022-11-19vs Good Get GirlsWon 30
W#1 DoublesXiaoming Ma / Ashley Yu vs Mercedes Migliore / Barbara Anderson6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesCarol Looby vs Kristine Lisi6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesYan Burger / Paula Baker vs Tina Dougherty / Hollie Skaggs6-3, 6-0
2022-11-12vs Slice GirlsWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarol Looby / Yan Burger vs Daniela Heredia / Ashley Falkowski6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesVicki Cheng vs Christine Ulrich4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesTelsche Marino / Ashley Yu vs Chris Coary / Cecilia Man6-3, 6-2
2022-11-05vs Volley LlamasWon 30
W#1 DoublesXiaoming Ma / Ashley Yu vs Cheryl Cox / Mary MacAllister6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesYan Burger vs Tina Zhao6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesVicki Cheng / Kalina Doytchinova-Weil vs Iwona Jakubowski / Kathleen Patterson6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Yan Burger
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.95
Carol Looby
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.80
Xiaoming Ma
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.68
Vicki Cheng
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.67
Jane Zhou
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Kalina Doytchinova-Weil
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.62
Elisabeth Posthill
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.48
Telsche Marino
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.38
Danielle Manley
published 3
2.31
Ashley Yu
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashley Yu + Jane Zhou2345% games+2.9% vs expected
Yan Burger + Xiaoming Ma4548% games+2.7% vs expected
Telsche Marino + Jane Zhou3349% games+1.5% vs expected
Danielle Manley + Telsche Marino61541% games−5.6% vs expected
Ashley Yu + Xiaoming Ma4354% gamesnot enough data
Vicki Cheng + Kalina Doytchinova-Weil4254% gamesnot enough data
Ashley Yu + Vicki Cheng134 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Yu + Danielle Manley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yan Burger
69W–36L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%7%93%
3.21
3
Carol Looby
103W–72L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
2.95
Xiaoming Ma
46W–38L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.80
Vicki Cheng
35W–43L career · 5 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
2.68
Jane Zhou
19W–17L career · 3 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
2.67
Kalina Doytchinova-Weil
22W–20L career · 4 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
2.63
Elisabeth Posthill
22W–27L career · 4 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
2.62
Telsche Marino
28W–31L career · 4 lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
2.48
3
Danielle Manley
22W–32L career · no lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
2.38
2.5
Ashley Yu
18W–18L career · 5 lines in 2023
0%91%9%
2.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.