Teams

CTL (A) 4.5M 18 & Over (Webb)

Mixed Doubles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Mixed 4.5

18 players · average NTRP 4.38 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-23vs CTL18/Meyers/CTFCWon 20
W#1 DoublesJenkins Mann / Rachel Herzog vs Corey Garrity / Katie Meyers6-6
W#2 DoublesChris Stier / Addison Flowers vs Chris Graham / Marlene Robinson4-5
2026-06-16vs CTL18/Meyers/CTFCLost 12
L#1 DoublesJenkins Mann / Rachel Herzog vs Boone Walker / Kacey Rugg4-4
W#2 DoublesCale Johnson / Kaylin Hopkins vs David Collins / Shannon Powers6-4
L#3 DoublesChris Stier / Lindsay Carney vs Alex Echols / Ginger Lee6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2026-06-09vs CTL18/Meyers/CTFCWon 21
W#1 DoublesSean Junis / Katherine Mathis vs Elliot Turner / Katie Meyers4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRyan Auger / Teri Grote vs Corey Garrity / Jessica Gore7-5, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCale Johnson / Addison Flowers vs Boone Walker / Marlene Robinson3-6, 4-6
2026-06-02vs CTL18/Meyers/CTFCWon 21
L#1 DoublesJosey Iliff / Gabrielle DuBruille vs Boone Walker / Laura Plyler3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAndrew Wescott / Sally Nguyen vs David Collins / Marlene Robinson6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDrew Casper / Lindsay Carney vs Alex Echols / Ginger Lee6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-19vs CTL18/Meyers/CTFCWon 21
W#1 DoublesSean Junis / Sally Nguyen vs David Collins / Ginger Lee6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJosey Iliff / Gabrielle DuBruille vs Corey Garrity / Kacey Rugg7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCharles Webb / Addison Flowers vs Elliot Turner / Brennan Ferguson7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2026-05-14vs CTL18/Meyers/CTFCWon 21
W#1 DoublesSean Junis / Sally Nguyen vs Chris Graham / Kristin Estes7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAndrew Wescott / Carlynn Musil vs Alex Echols / Shannon Powers5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCharles Webb / Rachel Herzog vs Elliot Turner / Marlene Robinson7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2026-05-05vs CTL18/Meyers/CTFCLost 12
L#1 DoublesAndrew Wescott / Teri Grote vs Laura Plyler / Corey Garrity2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesKaylin Hopkins / Drew Casper vs Katie Meyers / David Collins6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJosey Iliff / Gabrielle DuBruille vs Kacey Rugg / Kyle Edwards7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 18 & Over Mixed 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CTL (A) 4.5M 18 & Over (Webb)5213821180
2CTL18/Meyers/CTFC2581330217

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.18 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.50
Addison Flowers
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.41
Josey Iliff
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.37
Rachel Herzog
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.35
Drew Casper
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.34
Sean Junis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.33
Carlynn Musil
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.32
Cale Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.30
Charles Webb
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.26
Andrew Wescott
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.23
Teri Grote
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.15
Ryan Auger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.12
Sally Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.05
Kaylin Hopkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.88
Chris Stier
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.85
Jenkins Mann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Gabrielle DuBruille
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Katherine Mathis
published
Lindsay Carney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Josey Iliff + Gabrielle DuBruille4549% games+4.3% vs expected
Carlynn Musil + Andrew Wescott303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Addison Flowers
7W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
4.50
Josey Iliff
23W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
4.41
Rachel Herzog
42W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
4.37
4.5
Drew Casper
66W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
4.35
Sean Junis
11W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
4.34
4.5
Carlynn Musil
30W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%10%
4.33
4.5
Cale Johnson
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
4.32
4.5
Charles Webb
47W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
4.30
4.5
Andrew Wescott
26W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
4.26
Teri Grote
42W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
4.23
Ryan Auger
35W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
13%87%<1%
4.15
Sally Nguyen
57W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
4.12
Kaylin Hopkins
13W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
4.05
4
Chris Stier
36W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.88
Jenkins Mann
67W–41L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Gabrielle DuBruille
6W–9L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
3.50
Katherine Mathis
13W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lindsay Carney
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.