Teams

Team 1

2024 Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.17 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-05-23vs Tinsley/LR/LRACLost 03
L#1 DoublesShelia Jackson / Jill Hairston vs Paula Tinsley / Karen Koen4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKim Baker / Tracy Criss vs Dottie Highfill / Shanti Camp2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesClare Burks / Laurel Tait vs Tracy Webb-Rice / Marti Henson4-6, 1-6
2024-05-17vs Tinsley/LR/LRACLost 03
L#1 DoublesLinda Sneed / Kim Baker vs Lindy Spaulding / Karen Koen1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesShelia Jackson / Jill Hairston vs Judi Fess / Tamara McColey0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesClare Burks / Laurel Tait vs Barbie Wilson / Shanti Camp2-6, 2-6
2024-05-05vs Tinsley/LR/LRACSplit 11
L#1 DoublesShelia Jackson / Laurel Tait vs Wendy Mikula / Leslie Jackson1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesTracy Criss / Linda Sneed vs Tracy Webb-Rice / Marti Henson6-4, 6-1
2024-05-03vs Tinsley/LR/LRACLost 02
L#1 DoublesClare Burks / Shelia Jackson vs Judi Fess / Leslie Jackson3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLaurel Tait / Kim Baker vs Paula Tinsley / Barbie Wilson6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2024-04-05vs Tinsley/LR/LRACLost 02
L#1 DoublesLaurel Tait / Kim Baker vs Wendy Mikula / Lindy Spaulding3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesShelia Jackson / Clare Burks vs Tamara McColey / Paula Tinsley5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 9.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Tinsley/LR/LRAC50123791
2Team 10531224147

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Clare Burks
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Donna Warmack
published 4.5
3.97
Kim Baker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.95
Laurel Tait
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.67
Linda Sneed
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.44
Deanna Garretson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Jill Hairston
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Renata Byler
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Shelia Jackson
published
Tracy Criss
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laurel Tait + Kim Baker134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Clare Burks
2W–7L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Donna Warmack
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kim Baker
32W–15L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.97
Laurel Tait
8W–12L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.95
Linda Sneed
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.67
3.5
Deanna Garretson
33W–48L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
Jill Hairston
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Renata Byler
4W–3L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Shelia Jackson
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tracy Criss
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.