Teams

Racquet Club 3

2024 WINTER A18&O WEEKEND · 2024 Winter A18&O 3.5 WOMEN Career

15 players · average NTRP 3.60 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2024 Winter A18&O 3.5 WOMEN Career have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Amanda Guzzo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.54
Kathryn Glanz
published
3.51
Jennifer Mihalich
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.48
Rachel Sopkovich
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.47
Christy West
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.43
Belinda Hildebrandt
published 3.5
3.39
Amanda Keeton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Beth Kostelnick
published 3.5
3.33
Lexi Smith
published
3.26
Maureen Allison
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.18
Elizabeth Rave
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
3.06
Elizabeth Shafran
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Megan Landis
published
2.63
Jane Freer
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
Erin Biehl
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Mihalich + Lexi Smith6263% games+11.6% vs expected
Belinda Hildebrandt + Kathryn Glanz7069% games+10.3% vs expected
Amanda Guzzo + Jennifer Mihalich9161% games+9.0% vs expected
Jennifer Mihalich + Christy West9161% games+7.0% vs expected
Elizabeth Rave + Amanda Keeton8360% games+6.8% vs expected
Jennifer Mihalich + Kathryn Glanz8261% games+6.0% vs expected
Beth Kostelnick + Belinda Hildebrandt25760% games+5.3% vs expected
Elizabeth Rave + Erin Biehl3450% games+3.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amanda Guzzo
150W–71L career · 4 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.70
Kathryn Glanz
95W–43L career · no lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
3.54
Jennifer Mihalich
100W–55L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.51
Rachel Sopkovich
154W–44L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Christy West
76W–77L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Belinda Hildebrandt
108W–56L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.43
3.5
Amanda Keeton
22W–12L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Beth Kostelnick
74W–35L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.35
Lexi Smith
18W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Maureen Allison
41W–6L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%3%97%
3.26
Elizabeth Rave
87W–89L career · 8 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Elizabeth Shafran
30W–68L career · 1 line in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.06
Megan Landis
24W–29L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
2.86
Jane Freer
36W–72L career · 8 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
2.63
Erin Biehl
36W–59L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.