Teams

Joseph

2025 Neb. Adult 55&Over · 7.0 Adult Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-14vs Old Guys RuleLost 01
L#1 DoublesBill Moates / Jerry Milburn vs Kreg Green / Ed Boehle2-6, 1-6
2025-07-12vs WesterLost 02
L#1 DoublesRandy Haller / Wes Wright vs CHRIS PERRONE / Hani Haider4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNghia Nguyen / Jerry Milburn vs David Dorsett / Robert Wester6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-07vs BanksWon 10
W#2 DoublesWes Wright / Randy Haller vs Dale Banks / Tom Calvert6-2, 7-5
2025-06-30vs NE/Penland/55&Over7.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesWes Wright / Randy Haller vs Mike Gardner / Michael Ebert4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesFritz Craft / Jerry Milburn vs Greg Allen / Roger Penland1-6, 2-6
2025-06-14vs Old Guys RuleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesWes Wright / Randy Haller vs Joseph Chiu / Gareth Canaan6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesNghia Nguyen / Jerry Milburn vs Kreg Green / Roger Sunderman2-6, 2-6
2025-06-07vs BanksSplit 11
W#1 DoublesWes Wright / Randy Haller vs Dale Banks / Tom Calvert6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBill Moates / Fritz Craft vs Ryan Wills / Donald Huber4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-05-31vs NE/Penland/55&Over7.0MLost 12
W#1 DoublesWes Wright / Nghia Nguyen vs Mike Gardner / Glenn Thomson6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesFritz Craft / Jerry Milburn vs Matthew Bendler / Roger Penland2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBill Moates / Brett Joseph vs Ty Strawhecker / Roger Thompson0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.0 Adult Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NE/Penland/55&Over7.0M7117718162
2Wester43111026197
3Joseph1671428193

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brett Joseph
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Fritz Craft
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Bill Moates
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.87
Jerry Milburn
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Randy Haller
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Wes Wright
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brett Joseph + Jerry Milburn31334% games−8.2% vs expected
Brett Joseph + Randy Haller2838% games−11.1% vs expected
Wes Wright + Randy Haller5360% gamesnot enough data
Fritz Craft + Jerry Milburn1733% gamesnot enough data
Brett Joseph + Fritz Craft123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brett Joseph
36W–96L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Fritz Craft
15W–34L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Bill Moates
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.13
Jerry Milburn
17W–91L career · 5 lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
2.87
Randy Haller
18W–33L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Wes Wright
16W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.