Teams

Northshore Alley Cats

2026 Adult 40 and Over League · 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MAUI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-02-18vs Maui Match MakersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAmy Albert / Jennifer Hutchings vs Shannon Sayles / Rachael Barnard2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJanet Davis / Erika Varcak vs Colleen McKenna / Amy Peterson6-1, 6-2
2026-01-31vs Maui Match MakersLost 03
L#1 DoublesMaggie Mittendorf / Allison Kermode vs Erika Varcak / Sabrina Jardine5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Albert / Amy Peterson vs Christa Edwards / Elizabeth Lofaro1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesColleen McKenna / Caroline Cliff vs Melanie Devereux / Jennifer Kelley2-6, 1-6
2026-01-25vs Maui Match MakersLost 01
L#1 DoublesAllison Kermode / Kathe Schindler vs Sabrina Jardine / Janet Davis1-6, 4-6
2026-01-24vs Maui Match MakersLost 12
W#1 DoublesErika Varcak / Shannon Sayles vs Amy Albert / Eriko Drexler6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAllison Kermode / Colleen McKenna vs Jennifer Kelley / Stephanie Carlsen3-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesJennifer Hutchings / Kathe Schindler vs Sabrina Jardine / Melanie Devereux1-6, 1-6
2026-01-11vs Maui Match MakersLost 02
L#2 DoublesAmy Albert / Kathe Schindler vs Christa Edwards / Elizabeth Lofaro2-6, 3-6
L#4 DoublesTina Adams / Allison Kermode vs Melanie Devereux / Janet Davis2-6, 4-6
2026-01-10vs Maui Match MakersLost 02
L#1 SinglesAllison Kermode vs Erika Varcak2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Albert / Meg Obenauf vs Melissa Padillla / Elizabeth Lofaro0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Maui Match Makers602825112
2Northshore Alley Cats0622856336

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Erika Varcak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.75
Kathe Schindler
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Diane Bercik
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Allison Kermode
usually #2 Doubles 30%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.50
Colleen McKenna
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.40
Amy Albert
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Lisa Paulson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Kermode + Lisa Paulson404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Erika Varcak
36W–19L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.05
Kathe Schindler
25W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.75
3
Diane Bercik
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Allison Kermode
29W–50L career · 9 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Colleen McKenna
6W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
2.50
3
Amy Albert
1W–7L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
2.40
Lisa Paulson
27W–54L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.