Teams

SCole 40

2022 Cap Spring USTA 40 & over · 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.29 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-05-12vs JEvansSplit 11
W#1 SinglesJodi Zorzi vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Viscosi / Ange Urlaub vs Gwen Hedgepeth / Nancy Lorch0-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-05-05vs JKerzner/SaulsLost 12
L#1 SinglesJennifer Viscosi vs Jamie Kerzner3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSharon Cole / Katherine Canavan vs Aliza Bricklin / Suzanne Turnburke4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPamela Pitre / Holly Harris vs Darlene Miller / Anne Mueller1-6, 1-6
2022-04-28vs JFOGLEMANSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAndrea Miller vs Lori Bourne0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesPamela Pitre / Jennifer Viscosi vs Joanne Butler / Karen Gupton6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2022-04-21Won 30
W#1 SinglesAnge Urlaub vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPamela Pitre / Jodi Zorzi vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSharon Cole / Jennifer Viscosi vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-07vs JWOLBORSKY 3.5 (40)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAndrea Miller / Pamela Pitre vs Kelly Townsend / Laura Ross1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesKatherine Canavan vs Sierra Luz6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJennifer Viscosi / Wendy Davis vs Jennifer Wolborsky / Tassie McGannon6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2022-04-06vs JFOGLEMANLost 02
L#1 SinglesAndrea Miller vs Lori Bourne6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAnge Urlaub / Jodi Zorzi vs Brooke Abee / Meghan Yancey1-6, 3-6
2022-03-31vs JEvansSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSherrie Smith / Pamela Pitre vs Kathleen Buckner / Nancy Lorch6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJennifer Viscosi vs Lannie Hoffman6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJodi Zorzi / Ann Willard vs Gwen Hedgepeth / Denise Rinderer4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSharon Cole / Ange Urlaub vs Annette Langefeld / Patricia Zorko2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-03-24vs JKerzner/SaulsSplit 11
L#1 SinglesJennifer Viscosi vs Jamie Kerzner4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAnge Urlaub / Jodi Zorzi vs Mary Maiorano / Anne Iannucci3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-03-10vs IYBarrowLost 01
L#2 DoublesPamela Pitre / Jennifer Viscosi vs Yvonne Barrow / Martha Sanders6-7, 6-7
2022-03-03vs JWOLBORSKY 3.5 (40)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesPamela Pitre / Andrea Miller vs Camille Conzola / Tassie McGannon6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSherrie Smith / Ange Urlaub vs Traci Brooks / Linda Chabinsky6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSharon Cole / Katherine Canavan vs Kelly Townsend / Dianna Erwin2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Katherine Canavan
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 3.5
3.21
Sherrie Smith
published
3.20
Ann Willard
published 3.5
3.10
Sharon Cole
published
3.00
Jodi Zorzi
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.93
Kathleen Henig
published
2.87
Ange Urlaub
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Jennifer Viscosi
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 3
2.76
Andrea Miller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
2.61
Pamela Pitre
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jodi Zorzi + Pamela Pitre3640% gamesnot enough data
Jodi Zorzi + Ange Urlaub134 matchesnot enough data
Jodi Zorzi + Andrea Miller224 matchesnot enough data
Pamela Pitre + Andrea Miller044 matchesnot enough data
Andrea Miller + Jennifer Viscosi224 matchesnot enough data
Jodi Zorzi + Katherine Canavan123 matchesnot enough data
Pamela Pitre + Jennifer Viscosi123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Katherine Canavan
180W–118L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%37%63%
3.54
Sherrie Smith
5W–11L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Ann Willard
11W–22L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Sharon Cole
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Jodi Zorzi
35W–72L career · 5 lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.00
Kathleen Henig
18W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Ange Urlaub
128W–106L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Jennifer Viscosi
75W–86L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
2.84
3.5
Andrea Miller
71W–41L career · 4 lines in 2022
97%3%<1%
2.76
3
Pamela Pitre
47W–130L career · 7 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
2.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.