Teams

Green

2026 Adult 55 & Over-SW · Women 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-04-12vs NatchezWon 10
W#2 DoublesTanza Brown / Rhonda Rayborn vs Wanda Horne / Jessica Cater6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2026-04-07vs NatchezLost 12
W#1 DoublesSandy Winborne / Dwana Wright vs Suzan Hogue / Jackie Handjis6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBecky Green / Tesa Duckworth vs Cynthia McCormick / Kirby Watts4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTanza Brown / Rhonda Rayborn vs Margaret Fudickar / Penny Moak3-6, 1-6
2026-03-24vs NatchezLost 12
L#1 DoublesRockie Netherland / Rhonda Rayborn vs Augusta Smith / Margaret Fudickar2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesTina Roberts / Ruth Fly vs Cynthia McCormick / Kirby Watts6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCeleste Carty / Tanza Brown vs Jackie Handjis / Penny Moak3-6, 5-7
2026-03-21vs NatchezSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRockie Netherland / Dwana Wright vs Wanda Horne / Jessica Cater7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAnna Giust / Tesa Duckworth vs Suzan Hogue / Peggy Mayberry2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Rockie Netherland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Dwana Wright
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Tina Roberts
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Ruth Fly
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Anna Giust
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.78
Rhonda Rayborn
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
2.76
Celeste Carty
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Tanza Brown
usually #2 Doubles 78%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
2.49
Tesa Duckworth
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sandy Winborne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dwana Wright + Sandy Winborne314 matchesnot enough data
Rhonda Rayborn + Tanza Brown123 matchesnot enough data
Tanza Brown + Celeste Carty033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rockie Netherland
4W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.30
Dwana Wright
14W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.13
Tina Roberts
24W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
Ruth Fly
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.94
3
Anna Giust
24W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
Rhonda Rayborn
5W–14L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Celeste Carty
1W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
Tanza Brown
13W–21L career · 9 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.75
Tesa Duckworth
4W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.49
Sandy Winborne
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.