Teams

JByrd2-ENO

2025 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Men Wknd

11 players · average NTRP 3.58 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-21vs RGriffin-ENOLost 01
L#2 DoublesSagar Mistry / Devohn Vines vs Ethan Holston / Jonathan Ryan2-6, 1-6
2025-03-29vs JByrd-ENOLost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Sechrist / Devohn Vines vs Alex Piasecki / Benjamin Katz5-7, 4-6
2025-03-22vs KRamaswamy-ENOLost 01
L#1 DoublesVaibhav Parmar / Devohn Vines vs Shivam Panthri / Ravi Verma2-6, 6-7
2025-03-15vs ELanghans-ENOWon 10
W#1 DoublesCasey Collins / Devohn Vines vs Luca Menozzi / Eric Langhans6-2, 6-3
2025-03-07vs RGriffin-ENOWon 10
W#1 DoublesSagar Mistry / Devohn Vines vs Michael Muller / Ethan Holston6-2, 6-3
2025-03-01vs JMontague-ENOLost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Sechrist / Devohn Vines vs Michael Ratliff / Conor O'Neill3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-02-15vs CMoffitt-ENOLost 01
L#3 DoublesLloyd Scarberry / Devohn Vines vs Tyler Christensen / Kobi Talma3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Men Wknd have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Jermaine Byrd
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.69
Devohn Vines
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.37
Casey Collins
published 3.5
3.30
Kevin Williams
published
David Sechrist
published 3.5
3.20
David Belcher
published 3.5
2.95
Sagar Mistry
published
2.71
Matthew Ross
published
PHI PHAM
published
Vaibhav Parmar
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Devohn Vines + Casey Collins4260% games+9.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jermaine Byrd
135W–127L career · 12 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
4.04
3.5
Devohn Vines
50W–24L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.69
3.5
Casey Collins
22W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Kevin Williams
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
3.30
3.5
David Sechrist
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
David Belcher
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.20
Sagar Mistry
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Brandon van Buren
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Matthew Ross
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
PHI PHAM
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Vaibhav Parmar
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.