Teams

MLTC:Marcus Lewis Buccaneers:Bloomfield

2021 EMA Adult 55 & Over Men · 7.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-06-16vs TRU:Trull Brook:EllisLost 12
L#1 DoublesWalter Eriksen / Mark Desrochers vs Scott Ellis / Roland Gingras5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesPhil Wolf / Bruce Rachman vs Greg Adamson / Michael Fleming6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesAdam Cerel / Roberto Rodriguez vs Peter Kraus / Paul Rheault2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-06-14vs BWEL:BSC Wellesley:Fischer/SonnerWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichael Miller / Jim Rosenberg vs David Harris / Larry Fischer6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDavid Sammuli / Dayong Jin vs David Feldman / Andy Gelbert6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesPhil Wolf / Bruce Rachman vs David Sonner / Billy Han6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2021-06-07vs TRU:Trull Brook:EllisWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarcel Gamache / Jeffrey Bloomfield vs Scott Ellis / Robert McHugh6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMichael Miller / Jim Rosenberg vs Robin Hazel / Donald Fedyk6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDayong Jin / David Sammuli vs Peter Kraus / Paul Rheault6-4, 6-2
2021-05-27vs NETC:New England TC:O'DonnellWon 20
W#1 DoublesAdam Cerel / Dayong Jin vs Andy Samoiloff / Steve Gauthier2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Miller / Walter Eriksen vs Andrew Andrianopoulos / Svetlan Todorov6-4, 6-3
2021-05-24vs BWEL:BSC Wellesley:Fischer/SonnerWon 21
L#1 DoublesMichael Miller / Jim Rosenberg vs Timothy Andreae / David Harris4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesMarcel Gamache / Jeffrey Bloomfield vs David Olaksen / Andy Gelbert6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDayong Jin / David Sammuli vs Michael Appell / Richard Alcorn6-2, 6-4
2021-05-10vs NETC:New England TC:O'DonnellWon 30
W#1 DoublesDayong Jin / Mark Desrochers vs Dana Frye / David Cronin6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAdam Cerel / Roberto Rodriguez vs David O'Donnell / Andrew Andrianopoulos6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBruce Rachman / Phil Wolf vs Svetlan Todorov / Steve Gauthier6-4, 6-1
2021-05-03vs BWEL:BSC Wellesley:Fischer/SonnerWon 30
W#1 DoublesJim Rosenberg / Michael Miller vs Timothy Andreae / David Stolow6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMark Desrochers / Walter Eriksen vs David Sonner / Andy Gelbert6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBruce Rachman / Phil Wolf vs Larry Fischer / Billy Han6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2021-04-26vs TRU:Trull Brook:EllisWon 30
W#1 DoublesAdam Cerel / Roberto Rodriguez vs Kevin Thompson / Roland Gingras7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMark Desrochers / Walter Eriksen vs Michael McCabe / Eduardo Rosado6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Bloomfield / Marcel Gamache vs Robert McHugh / Michael Arsenault6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Bruce Rachman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
David Sammuli
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Adam Cerel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Dayong Jin
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Jeffrey Bloomfield
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jim Rosenberg
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Marcel Gamache
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Mark Desrochers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Phil Wolf
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Walter Eriksen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Phil Wolf + Mark Desrochers15958% games+2.3% vs expected
Phil Wolf + Bruce Rachman3255% gamesnot enough data
Walter Eriksen + Jeffrey Bloomfield314 matchesnot enough data
Walter Eriksen + Mark Desrochers224 matchesnot enough data
Jeffrey Bloomfield + Bruce Rachman314 matchesnot enough data
Marcel Gamache + Jeffrey Bloomfield303 matchesnot enough data
David Sammuli + Dayong Jin303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bruce Rachman
38W–59L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
David Sammuli
30W–32L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Adam Cerel
7W–6L career · type S · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Dayong Jin
5W–1L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jeffrey Bloomfield
28W–36L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jim Rosenberg
50W–26L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Marcel Gamache
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mark Desrochers
55W–33L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Phil Wolf
69W–36L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Walter Eriksen
15W–20L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.