← Teams

ACuni/Lynch: 7Oaks

2022 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.06 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-10-10vs BRobinson 5.5 18+Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesLaura Lee Gillenwater / Carrie Martinelli vs Erika Plant / Laura Yates6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2022-10-09vs BWilhelm Combo 5.5Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesLaura Lee Gillenwater / Mary Adams vs Becky Barnette / Susan Furr6-2, 6-2
2022-09-25vs JBoda Fall 5.5 ComboLost 0–1
L#2 DoublesKay Bonavita / Shannon Strauss vs Melissa Weber / Michelle Metelo6-7, 0-6
2022-09-11vs CBeairdLost 0–1
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Lindsay / Kay Bonavita vs Leila Thomas / Caroline Beaird0-6, 2-6
2022-08-28vs ICWaychoff Fall ComboSplit 1–1
L#2 DoublesShannon Strauss / Kay Bonavita vs Jennifer Bent / Rachel McLean1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesShannon Parham / Beth Gildea vs Grace Poole / Kristin Upchurch6-3, 6-3
2022-08-28vs IPSpellWon 2–0
W#1 DoublesLaura Lee Gillenwater / Megan Lynch vs Donna Driscoll / Terry Marcott6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesShannon Parham / Beth Gildea vs Shana Lentz / Jennifer Kazmierczak6-2, 6-3
2022-08-14vs JSolomonSplit 1–1
W#2 DoublesAmy Cuni / Beth Gildea vs Lea Edmondson / McGavock Edwards6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMary Adams / Laura Lee Gillenwater vs Jennifer Kimball / Michele Nowicki7-5, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Lauren Fye
published 3.5
3.33
Merab Puleo
published —
2.91
Amy Cuni
published 3
2.88
Beth Gildea
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.76
Kay Bonavita
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
—
2.72
Laura Lee Gillenwater
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.63
Ann Mailly
published 3
2.60
Shannon Parham
published —
2.54
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Gildea + Lauren Fye3–03 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lauren Fye
218W–63L career · no lines in 2022
<1%28%72%
3.58
—
Merab Puleo
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3
Amy Cuni
9W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Beth Gildea
89W–30L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Kay Bonavita
75W–54L career · 7 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Carrie Martinelli
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
—
3
Laura Lee Gillenwater
27W–23L career · 4 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
2.72
3
Ann Mailly
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
2.63
—
Shannon Parham
2W–9L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
2.60
3
Elizabeth Vandecarr
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
2.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.