Teams

David East

2024 Adult 55&Over-NE · Men 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.92 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-04-21vs Busby 55+-Columbus-MTCSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJack Reed / Eddie Powell vs Michael Busby / Bill Black7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHarris Magruder / Jack Hodges vs Robert Chamblee / Carlos Flynn7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2024-04-21vs Busby 55+-Columbus-MTCSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJack Reed / Eddie Powell vs Bill Black / Michael Busby7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHarris Magruder / Charles Arnold vs Robert Chamblee / Carlos Flynn6-7, 5-7
2024-04-17vs Busby 55+-Columbus-MTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesScott Reed / Shane Harrington vs Seong-Gon Kim / Berk Huskison6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRoger Huey / Greg Weatherford vs Michael Busby / Bill Black2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJack Hodges / Charles Arnold vs Phil McClellan / Doug Webber3-6, 2-6
2024-03-24vs Busby 55+-Columbus-MTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesScott Reed / Shane Harrington vs Bill Black / Doug Webber6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCharles Arnold / Greg Weatherford vs Seong-Gon Kim / Berk Huskison0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesRoger Huey / Jack Hodges vs Michael Busby / Phil McClellan6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Scott Reed
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Harris Magruder
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Eddie Powell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Jack Hodges
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Shane Harrington
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Roger Huey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.63
Greg Weatherford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Charles Arnold
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Reed + Shane Harrington303 matchesnot enough data
Harris Magruder + Roger Huey033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Scott Reed
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Harris Magruder
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Brett Hildenbrand
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Eddie Powell
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Jack Hodges
4W–1L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Shane Harrington
13W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
Roger Huey
5W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
15%84%<1%
3.63
4
Greg Weatherford
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.63
3.5
Charles Arnold
11W–4L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
<1%17%83%
3.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.