← Teams

MV-Harbell/Walker

2019 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 2.75 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Stephanie Harbell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Kathryn Harlan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.53
Irina Stolerman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
—
Jennifer Gwin
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 2.5
—
Patricia Kuchar
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 0
Results14 ties
2019-07-21Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesRoger Gwin / Stephanie Harbell vs Travis Holz / Karen Klump6-4, 6-3
2019-07-20Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesRoger Gwin / Stephanie Harbell vs Bill Boyett / Jenifer Hillyer6-1, 6-1
2019-07-19Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesRoger Gwin / Stephanie Harbell vs Jeff Gugliotto / Carlin Cooley7-6, 6-2
2019-03-30Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesMasami Kusakabe / Jennifer Gwin vs Laura Kaufman / Delena Palena6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 SinglesPatricia Kuchar vs Chana Dolbey6-0, 6-2
2019-03-10Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesStephanie Harbell / Anne Johnson vs Theresa Fichter / Debbie Spitzer6-0, 6-3
L#1 SinglesPatricia Kuchar vs Jinquan Wu6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJennifer Gwin / Masami Kusakabe vs Jennifer Fei / Wanda Ng6-2, 6-0
2019-03-03Lost 1–2
L#2 DoublesAnne Johnson / Patricia Kuchar vs Sara Crate / Melissa Jacobs6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesIrina Stolerman vs Anne Mangan6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJennifer Gwin / Missy Kim vs Deanna Phillips / Deborah Wood6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2019-02-23Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesStephanie Harbell / Karen Walker vs Julie LaMontagne / Catherine Greenblatt6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNoelle Hamilton / Patricia Kuchar vs Colleen Walker / Barbara Lolich6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2019-02-16Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesKaren Walker / Stephanie Harbell vs Lisa McBee / Cricket Forsey6-4, 6-4
2019-02-02Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesKaren Walker / Stephanie Harbell vs Kim Tellin / Jennifer McKittrick6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Gwin / Ashley Gwin vs Diana Crawford / Mckenzie Crawford6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesPatricia Kuchar vs Ann Hays6-2, 7-5
2019-01-27Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesKaren Walker / Stephanie Harbell vs Trish Carder / Christina Bergstrom7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJennifer Gwin / Masami Kusakabe vs Nancy Lowenberg / Gail Vogel6-1, 6-4
2019-01-13Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesKaren Walker / Stephanie Harbell vs Betty Roux / Robyn Hilden6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKathryn Harlan / Masami Kusakabe vs Lucinda Watson / Susan Bradley7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2018-12-09Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesRoger Gwin / Stephanie Harbell vs Melody Wang / William Allers6-1, 6-1
2018-12-08Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesRoger Gwin / Stephanie Harbell vs William Wang / Janice Kuo6-0, 6-2
2018-12-08Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesRoger Gwin / Stephanie Harbell vs Peter Singson / Courtney Storrs7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Stephanie Harbell
70W–26L career
not enough data
—
3
Kathryn Harlan
20W–40L career
14%84%3%
2.69
2.5
Irina Stolerman
24W–47L career
0%34%66%
2.53
2.5
Jennifer Gwin
34W–47L career
not enough data
—
0
Patricia Kuchar
24W–44L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.