← Teams

JStewart

2022 Cap Mixed 18 & over · 7.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.56 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-14vs IGesher7.0Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesMeryl Golder / Adam Deuel vs Mary Cockrill / Max Stevenson7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesStephen Fu / Judith Stewart vs Holly Camak / David Hodl2-6, 3-6
2022-07-17vs AMerdesWon 2–1
W#1 DoublesAmber Cagle / Adam Deuel vs Alecia Barnes / Tracy Behar6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMeryl Golder / Anthony Womack vs Brian Soltz / Phyllis Soltz7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDoug Schoelzel / Laurene Fitzgerald vs Matt Poulk / Daphne Poulk2-6, 2-6
2022-07-17vs MOSMANLost 0–2
L#2 DoublesMeryl Golder / Art Rimbert vs Sam Osman / McKenzie Keenan Osman3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesStephen Fu / Judith Stewart vs Lee Parker / Amie Irby3-6, 4-6
2022-06-26vs IJBrooksSplit 1–1
L#2 DoublesArt Rimbert / Amber Cagle vs Tom Harman / Diane Abourisk6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStephen Fu / Judith Stewart vs David Lee / Julie Lee7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2022-06-19vs HDuggins18+7.0Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesStephen Fu / Judith Stewart vs Ann Willard / Robert Duggins7-5, 7-5
2022-06-05vs KWhitneyLost 0–2
L#1 DoublesAmber Cagle / Adam Deuel vs Anne Elizabeth Harrell / Adam Dailey6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLaurene Fitzgerald / Doug Schoelzel vs Chris Smith / Stephanie Disbrow2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Meryl Golder
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.71
Amber Cagle
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.43
Alison Kalinowski
published 3.5
3.36
Anthony Womack
published 3.5
—
Adam Deuel
published 3.5
—
Alan McSwain
published 3.5
3.18
Art Rimbert
published 3.5
3.13
Judith Stewart
published —
3.05
Stephen Fu
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.84
Laurene Fitzgerald
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anthony Womack + Alison Kalinowski2–13 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Meryl Golder
141W–76L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%33%67%
4.06
4
Amber Cagle
216W–100L career · 3 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
3.5
Alison Kalinowski
27W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Anthony Womack
16W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Adam Deuel
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
—
3.5
Alan McSwain
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
—
3.5
Art Rimbert
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
—
Judith Stewart
8W–11L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Stephen Fu
75W–130L career · 4 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.05
3
Laurene Fitzgerald
101W–157L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
2.84

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.