Teams

KY/BG/MURRAY

2024 SOUTHERN COMBO DOUBLES 18 & Over- BG · 6.5 MEN

9 players · average NTRP 3.60 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-09-26vs KY/BG/CAMPBELLLost 01
L#1 DoublesTimothy Davis / Dennie Murray vs Hank Campbell / Gerod Truelove4-8
2024-09-24vs KY/BG/CAMPBELLWon 20
W#1 DoublesBart Flener / Will Taylor vs Hank Campbell / Gerod Truelove8-6
W#3 DoublesRalph Gonzalez / Cody Sheffield vs Christopher Clarkson / Tyler Spady8-6
2024-09-21vs KY/BG/CAMPBELLSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJustin Hester / Timothy Davis vs Carl Coffey / Kyle Owsley8-6
L#2 DoublesBart Flener / Will Taylor vs Gerod Truelove / Hank Campbell8-9
2024-09-20vs KY/BG/CAMPBELLWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrandon Sheffield / Dakota Campbell vs Hank Campbell / Rana Pasham8-5
W#2 DoublesRalph Gonzalez / Cody Sheffield vs Tyler Spady / Christopher Clarkson8-2
2024-09-18vs KY/BG/CAMPBELLSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDakota Campbell / Brandon Sheffield vs Hank Campbell / Rana Pasham6-8
W#2 DoublesJustin Hester / Timothy Davis vs Kyle Owsley / Carl Coffey8-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 6.5 MEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/BG/MURRAY3287787

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brandon Sheffield
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Cody Sheffield
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.42
Bart Flener
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Justin Hester
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Dennie Murray
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Timothy Davis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.71
Dakota Campbell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.43
Ralph Gonzalez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Will Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cody Sheffield + Brandon Sheffield5255% games+21.4% vs expected
Timothy Davis + Dennie Murray3255% games+15.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brandon Sheffield
9W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Cody Sheffield
14W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Bart Flener
9W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.42
Justin Hester
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Dennie Murray
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Timothy Davis
10W–8L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Dakota Campbell
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%93%1%
2.71
Ralph Gonzalez
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
71%29%<1%
2.43
Will Taylor
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.