Teams

RUBY HILL GC CW7.5A-DT

2025 COMBO - Daytime · Women 7.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-30vs OSAGE PK CW7.5A-DTWon 30
W#1 DoublesDanielle Duperly / Veronika Svecova vs Debbie Alster / Rachel Gilchrist6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMary O'Neill / Janet Ward vs Julie Adelson / Trish Nornhold4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMonya Lane / Emily Zhang vs Wendy Greer / Sarah Shapiro7-6, 7-5
2025-10-09vs OSAGE PK CW7.5A-DTLost 12
L#1 DoublesVeronika Svecova / Christine Harkness vs Katherine Ryan / Lang Lindsay4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPensri Walsh / Monya Lane vs Debbie Alster / Rachel Gilchrist2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKathleen Berriatua / Lorna Smith vs Marci Dublin / Trish Nornhold7-6, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Nora Hart
published
3.70
Danielle Duperly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Kareen Nelson
published
3.52
Monya Lane
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.48
Christine Harkness
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Veronika Svecova
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Carolyn Comerford
published 3.5
3.45
Mary O'Neill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Ashley West
published 3.5
3.13
Pensri Walsh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Kathy D'Onofrio
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Lorna Smith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kathleen Berriatua
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Patricia Kang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danielle Duperly + Nora Hart16557% games+0.6% vs expected
Kareen Nelson + Nora Hart5060% gamesnot enough data
Christine Harkness + Kareen Nelson134 matchesnot enough data
Kathy D'Onofrio + Veronika Svecova123 matchesnot enough data
Danielle Duperly + Veronika Svecova303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nora Hart
39W–18L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Danielle Duperly
39W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Kareen Nelson
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Monya Lane
7W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.52
4
Christine Harkness
2W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
56%44%<1%
3.48
Veronika Svecova
17W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Carolyn Comerford
19W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.45
Mary O'Neill
14W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Ashley West
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Pensri Walsh
10W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Kathy D'Onofrio
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
Lorna Smith
4W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
83%17%<1%
2.87
Kathleen Berriatua
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Kang
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.