Teams

PLACE/ McMULLEN- Broadlands

2022 Loudoun Singles Women · Loudoun Women's 3.0 Singles

6 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-10-20Lost 01
L#3 SinglesLynn Colavita vs Jacqueline Corcoran4-6, 1-6
2022-10-06vs McMANUSSplit 11
W#1 SinglesGretchen Leitch vs Andre Kettell6-2, 6-4
L#3 SinglesLynn Colavita vs Tricia Hodnett3-6, 4-6
2022-09-30Split 11
W#2 SinglesLynn Colavita vs Kimberly Sysak6-2, 6-2
L#3 SinglesLaleh Packard vs Janann Mercker0-6, 6-7
2022-09-29vs McMANUSLost 01
L#2 SinglesLynn Colavita vs Marguerite McFadden0-6, 5-7
2022-09-27vs McMANUSLost 02
L#1 SinglesGretchen Leitch vs Zoie Acadia6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesLaleh Packard vs Andre Kettell4-6, 6-7
2022-09-15Lost 02
L#1 SinglesGretchen Leitch vs Abbey Fecher6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesLynn Colavita vs Janann Mercker3-6, 4-6
2022-09-08vs McMANUSLost 02
L#1 SinglesLaleh Packard vs Marguerite McFadden1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesLisa Furgal vs Rebecca Norman1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Women's 3.0 Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Gretchen Leitch
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.24
Lisa Furgal
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
2.95
Lynn Colavita
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
2.88
Stephanie Place
published 3
2.85
Patti Sinnen
published 3
2.65
Laleh Packard
usually #3 Singles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Place + Lynn Colavita91943% games−9.2% vs expected
Stephanie Place + Patti Sinnen4548% gamesnot enough data
Stephanie Place + Gretchen Leitch1637% gamesnot enough data
Laleh Packard + Lynn Colavita2441% gamesnot enough data
Patti Sinnen + Lynn Colavita1542% gamesnot enough data
Laleh Packard + Patti Sinnen033 matchesnot enough data
Gretchen Leitch + Lynn Colavita123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Gretchen Leitch
114W–121L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Lisa Furgal
204W–131L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Lynn Colavita
105W–144L career · 5 lines in 2022
65%35%<1%
2.95
3
Stephanie Place
130W–213L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%18%
2.88
3
Patti Sinnen
92W–115L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Laleh Packard
88W–156L career · 6 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.