Teams

SFV Topspinners

SFV-Adult 18 & Over-WeekDay · SFV Women 4.0 Weekday

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-05-21vs LLW - Team Carter - Cindi CarterLost 01
L#1 DoublesMelissa Sherline / Julia Melito vs Kristin McQueen / Wei Zhang6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2021-05-07vs SFV Strung OverLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulia Melito / Melissa Sherline vs Michele Garber / Miri Mizrahi6-7, 2-6
2021-04-23vs SFV Slice GirlsWon 20
W#1 DoublesJulia Melito / Melissa Sherline vs Jayne Kamin-Oncea / Patricia Dunn6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesStella Ko vs Aimee Butcher6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2021-04-08vs SFV Ace KickersLost 01
L#2 DoublesSusan Carlson / Amy Hasquet vs Elyse Gainor / Wendy Globerman3-6, 3-6
2021-04-02vs SFV Strung OverLost 01
L#1 DoublesKristi Bala / Melissa Sherline vs Bruny Haas / Corrine Weiner3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-03-26vs SFV iAceWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulia Melito / Melissa Sherline vs Jo-Ann Coleman / Julie Perron6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV Women 4.0 Weekday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Stella Ko
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.05
Kathleen Feig
published 4
3.78
Melissa Sherline
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Julia Melito
published
3.69
Suzie Yamamoto
published
3.66
Laura Waldman
published
3.65
Nina Prestidge
published
3.61
Mary Manix
published
3.57
Amy Hasquet
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Alice Palermo
published 4
3.16
Goli Afshari
published 3.5
3.16
Susan Carlson
published
3.07
Lauren Plutsky
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Sherline + Julia Melito224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Stella Ko
85W–31L career · 1 line in 2021
8%92%1%
4.19
4
Kathleen Feig
148W–95L career · no lines in 2021
<1%34%66%
4.05
4
Melissa Sherline
115W–104L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.78
Julia Melito
15W–7L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.74
Suzie Yamamoto
7W–9L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
Laura Waldman
19W–51L career · no lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
3.66
Nina Prestidge
4W–5L career · no lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.65
Mary Manix
5W–5L career · no lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Amy Hasquet
92W–169L career · 1 line in 2021
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Alice Palermo
2W–15L career · no lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Goli Afshari
6W–13L career · no lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
3.16
Susan Carlson
13W–10L career · no lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.16
Lauren Plutsky
1W–7L career · no lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.