Teams

LWGO-Goodwin/NMP 6.5 Mon 40

2022 Lake Combo Doubles 40 & Over · Women 6.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-09-19vs LSErber-North/EdgemoorLost 02
L#1 DoublesArlene Ireland / Lindsay Payne vs Buket Boucher / Lisa Turley4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCindy Mexcur / Wendy Goodwin vs Terri Langbo / Beth Packard7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-09-12vs LSMcCueTakesBarber/EdgemoorSplit 11
L#1 DoublesArlene Ireland / Cindy Japec vs Shelly McCue / Linda Fogel5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMargaret Dittemore / Allison Terry vs Bethany Barber / Lisa Smith6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-08-29vs LMAdinolfi/The FarmsWon 10
W#1 DoublesMargaret Dittemore / Allison Terry vs Christie Werkman / Susan Blakey6-0, 6-1
2022-08-22vs LAMcRorie/JettonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLindsay Payne / Arlene Ireland vs Kathleen Rissberger / Kim Kelly Senff1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMargaret Dittemore / Allison Terry vs Liz Mcclain / Nicole Biffle6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2022-08-15vs LDAndiloro/LNTCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCindy Japec / Patricia Starnes vs Robbin Turner / Jennifer Svienty3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMargaret Dittemore / Allison Terry vs Julie Coughlin / Beth Welch6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Allison Terry
published 4
3.46
Cindy Japec
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.33
Cindy Mexcur
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Lindsay Payne
published
3.03
Anette Solmaz
published 3.5
2.91
Margaret Dittemore
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.80
Arlene Ireland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.55
Wendy Goodwin
published
Lisa Wilkens
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Mexcur + Margaret Dittemore4650% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Japec + Margaret Dittemore2349% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Mexcur + Wendy Goodwin134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Allison Terry
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.94
3.5
Cindy Japec
242W–219L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Cindy Mexcur
161W–157L career · 1 line in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
Lindsay Payne
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Anette Solmaz
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Margaret Dittemore
52W–63L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%75%24%
2.91
3
Arlene Ireland
116W–115L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
Wendy Goodwin
12W–26L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
2.55
Lisa Wilkens
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.