Teams

Tampa Palms - E. Vickers

2021 Hillsborough Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-03-06vs Apollo Beach - J. FeeneyWon 20
W#1 DoublesKaren Cachion / Tina Sturdevant vs Patricia Berger / Kimberly Topliffe6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKaren Cleland / Annmarie Iwanicki vs Jane Feeney / Sharon Pate6-2, 6-1
2021-02-28Won 20
W#1 DoublesTricia Cardoso / Sherry Peterson vs Patricia Berger / Kimberly Topliffe7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnne McKenna / Cindy Sparks vs Rhonda Russell / Columbia Kidder6-3, 7-6
2021-02-27vs Plant City - C. ScalettaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTina Sturdevant / Carmen Heggen vs Patricia Smith / Sheila Brown2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCindy Sparks / Linda Davis vs Catherine Clayton / Cynthia Scaletta3-6, 3-6
2021-02-20vs Hills - Apollo Beach/M. FlynnLost 01
L#3 DoublesCindy Arment / Karen Cleland vs Renee Hovden / Shirley Payne6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2021-02-06vs Plant City - C. ScalettaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAnne McKenna / Cindy Sparks vs Mary Huntington / Susan Rind2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCindy Arment / Tricia Cardoso vs Cynthia Scaletta / Julianna Holbrook6-3, 6-0
2021-01-30vs Hills - Apollo Beach/M. FlynnLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnnmarie Iwanicki / Karen Cleland vs Mary Flynn / Sally Raque5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Guidera / Tina Sturdevant vs Renee Hovden / Shirley Payne6-7, 4-6
2021-01-23vs Apollo Beach - J. FeeneyWon 20
W#2 DoublesKaren Cleland / Cindy Arment vs Amalia Alaniz / Sharon Pate7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCarol Guidera / Tina Sturdevant vs Nancy Matuszak / Rhonda Russell6-1, 6-1
2021-01-16vs Plant City - C. ScalettaWon 10
W#2 DoublesKaren Cleland / Cindy Arment vs Julianna Holbrook / Cynthia Scaletta6-2, 6-3
2021-01-09vs Hills - Apollo Beach/M. FlynnLost 02
L#1 DoublesCindy Sparks / Linda Davis vs Lisa McCarthy / Patty Trabue1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCindy Arment / Karen Cleland vs Mary Flynn / Sally Raque3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Erin Vickers
published 3.5
2.86
Annmarie Iwanicki
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.82
Sherry Peterson
published
2.76
Karen Cachion
published
2.73
Cindy Arment
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.72
Carol Guidera
published 3
2.65
Tina Sturdevant
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.64
Tricia Cardoso
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.55
Carmen Heggen
published 3
2.52
Karen Cleland
published
2.33
Anne McKenna
published 3
2.23
Cindy Sparks
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Arment + Tricia Cardoso151453% games+4.5% vs expected
Tricia Cardoso + Annmarie Iwanicki241153% games+2.5% vs expected
Cindy Arment + Annmarie Iwanicki1546% gamesnot enough data
Tricia Cardoso + Tina Sturdevant1537% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Arment + Carmen Heggen213 matchesnot enough data
Tina Sturdevant + Sherry Peterson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Erin Vickers
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.16
3
Annmarie Iwanicki
85W–59L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
2.86
Sherry Peterson
21W–17L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
2.82
Karen Cachion
8W–9L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Cindy Arment
50W–43L career · 5 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Carol Guidera
6W–3L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Tina Sturdevant
184W–133L career · 4 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
2.65
Tricia Cardoso
76W–64L career · 2 lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
2.64
3
Carmen Heggen
5W–15L career · no lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
2.55
Karen Cleland
3W–14L career · no lines in 2021
45%55%<1%
2.52
3
Anne McKenna
3W–11L career · no lines in 2021
90%10%<1%
2.33
2.5
Cindy Sparks
48W–86L career · 4 lines in 2021
0%98%2%
2.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.