Teams

CCW CONTRERAS

2025 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - SOCO · MIXED 7.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

12 players · average NTRP 3.56 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-18vs FLYHS RATHMANNWon 30
W#1 DoublesAdan Briones / Emily Butler vs Elayna Rathmann / Marc Rathmann6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDaniel Michon / Joy Farmer vs Jane Roberts / Ron Mast6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesTom Jackson / Erin Contreras vs Martina Levkus / Martin Levkus6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-05-11vs CSRC BOYLEWon 21
L#1 DoublesJoy Farmer / Daniel Michon vs Richard Boyle / Aery Cobb5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Illsley / Kit McFarland vs Marcos Velasco / Karae Hopkins6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAdan Briones / Emily Butler vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-05-04vs CSRC KULICHWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoy Farmer / Daniel Michon vs William Stone / Eliza Montoya6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesAugie Mendoza / Kit McFarland vs Megan Barry / Kiran Phillips6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKele Hauke / Craig Gaydos vs Amanda Irons / James Robers6-4, 6-0
2025-04-27vs FLYHS RATHMANNWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoy Farmer / Augie Mendoza vs Elayna Rathmann / Marc Rathmann6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesEmily Butler / Benjamin Butler vs Martina Levkus / Martin Levkus6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesErin Contreras / Tom Jackson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-04-20vs CSRC BOYLEWon 30
W#1 DoublesKit McFarland / David Illsley vs Karae Hopkins / Marcos Velasco6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEmily Butler / Adan Briones vs Claudia Goddard / Richard Boyle6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKele Hauke / Craig Gaydos vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-04-13vs CSRC KULICHLost 12
W#1 DoublesKit McFarland / Daniel Michon vs William Stone / Eliza Montoya7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesErin Contreras / Adan Briones vs Jeff Kulich / Gina Baaklini6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEmily Butler / Benjamin Butler vs Aaron Folsom / Alex Folsom3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-04-06vs FLYHS RATHMANNWon 30
W#1 DoublesEmily Butler / Adan Briones vs Martina Levkus / Ron Mast6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKit McFarland / David Illsley vs Kristi Creps / Scott Bryant6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKele Hauke / Craig Gaydos vs Elayna Rathmann / Marc Rathmann6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 7.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
David Illsley
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.84
Daniel Michon
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.65
Augie Mendoza
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.63
Emily Butler
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Kit McFarland
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.34
Tom Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Erin Contreras
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Craig Gaydos
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Kele Hauke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Joy Farmer
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.96
Benjamin Butler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Adan Briones
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Butler + Benjamin Butler10854% games+6.4% vs expected
Daniel Michon + Joy Farmer4356% games−3.1% vs expected
David Illsley + Kele Hauke8257% gamesnot enough data
Erin Contreras + Daniel Michon4450% gamesnot enough data
David Illsley + Kit McFarland6163% gamesnot enough data
David Illsley + Erin Contreras4157% gamesnot enough data
Kele Hauke + Daniel Michon2348% gamesnot enough data
Emily Butler + Adan Briones5064% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Illsley
101W–62L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Daniel Michon
98W–79L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Augie Mendoza
26W–18L career · type S · 5 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
Emily Butler
42W–26L career · 9 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.63
3.5
Kit McFarland
53W–28L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
Tom Jackson
14W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Erin Contreras
68W–66L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Craig Gaydos
95W–74L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Kele Hauke
119W–93L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Joy Farmer
14W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
3
Benjamin Butler
27W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.96
3
Adan Briones
35W–11L career · type A · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.