Teams

BRTC:Bass River Red:Olson/Whitehouse

2026 EMA Adult 55 & Over Men · 6.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-25vs BRTC Blue 2026:OlsonWon 21
L#1 DoublesStephen Gleason / Paul Gudonis vs Michael Butter / Mark Glover4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRichard DiMaggio / David Robbins vs Jon Bornstein / Lawrence Schall6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMark DiGiovanni / David Comb vs Gary Moffie / Joseph Olson6-2, 6-3
2026-08-24vs BRTC Blue 2026:OlsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesPaul Gudonis / Stephen Gleason vs Lawrence Schall / Gary Moffie3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesRichard DiMaggio / David Robbins vs Joseph Olson / Jon Bornstein5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMark DiGiovanni / David Comb vs Neil Whitehouse / Mark Glover2-6, 5-7
2026-08-14vs BRTC Blue 2026:OlsonLost 12
W#1 DoublesMark DiGiovanni / Paul Gudonis vs Mark Glover / Michael Butter6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDavid Comb / Richard DiMaggio vs Gary Moffie / Neil Whitehouse5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDavid Robbins / Stephen Gleason vs Joseph Olson / Lawrence Schall4-6, 4-6
2026-08-08vs BRTC Blue 2026:OlsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesMark DiGiovanni / Richard DiMaggio vs Joseph Olson / Mark Glover4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPaul Gudonis / David Robbins vs Gary Moffie / Michael Butter5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Comb / Stephen Gleason vs Lawrence Schall / Neil Whitehouse6-1, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BRTC Blue 2026:Olson0242453
2BRTC:Bass River Red:Olson/Whitehouse0224960

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.83
David Comb
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
David Robbins
published 3
Mark DiGiovanni
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Paul Gudonis
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Richard DiMaggio
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Stephen Gleason
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard DiMaggio + Paul Gudonis2349% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
David Comb
7W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
David Robbins
11W–23L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mark DiGiovanni
6W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Paul Gudonis
9W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Richard DiMaggio
8W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stephen Gleason
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.