Teams

EHTC:String Busters 40+:DeJuan/Tetreault

2025 NCT Adult 40 & Over Men · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
L#1 DoublesSureshbabu Jothimani / RAMESH ARUMUGAGOUNDER vs Steven Ballentine / Chris Drew0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAmandeep Mundra vs Jeff Korp6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTod Robberson / Paul Tetreault vs Tom Rosedale / Jeff Palmer2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJOSE DEJUAN / Panos Oikonomou vs Damon Querim / Jayme Varao2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Amandeep Mundra
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Tod Robberson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
John Henderson
published 3.5
3.14
Paul Tetreault
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
JOSE DEJUAN
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Sureshbabu Jothimani
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Angel Santiago
published 3.5
2.97
Panos Oikonomou
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Khane Moundraty
published
RAMESH ARUMUGAGOUNDER
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Thomas Donovan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tod Robberson + JOSE DEJUAN2740% games+4.1% vs expected
JOSE DEJUAN + Khane Moundraty8255% games+2.9% vs expected
Paul Tetreault + JOSE DEJUAN6848% games−3.8% vs expected
Paul Tetreault + Tod Robberson6648% games−4.7% vs expected
Paul Tetreault + Angel Santiago2344% games−17.3% vs expected
Tod Robberson + Khane Moundraty033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amandeep Mundra
11W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
Tod Robberson
75W–138L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.25
3.5
John Henderson
no matches on record · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Paul Tetreault
78W–113L career · 1 line in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
JOSE DEJUAN
96W–135L career · 1 line in 2025
28%71%<1%
3.07
Sureshbabu Jothimani
16W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.07
3.5
Angel Santiago
52W–45L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
Panos Oikonomou
65W–59L career · 1 line in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.97
Khane Moundraty
96W–44L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
RAMESH ARUMUGAGOUNDER
9W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Donovan
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.