Teams

BP ORANGE

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-02vs GLDN REDLost 23
L#1 DoublesMichael Gomez / Steve Cannata vs Karl Herz / Troy Lowrie2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMatt Whitmer vs Devin Johnson6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDamon Graham-Haradon / Brian Dino vs David Bailey / Wayne Williamson6-2, 7-5
W#2 SinglesJeffrey Greenberg vs Nicolai Lundy6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJon Mason / Dave Klene vs Edward Pulido / Kishore Kulkarni5-7, 4-6
2021-05-26vs RHCC BLUEWon 32
W#1 DoublesSteve Cannata / Michael Gomez vs Daniel Rabbitt / Nick Hendrickson6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesZac Bergquist vs Matthew Charles6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Foonberg / Joe Hendricks vs Ron Jones / Clarence Cottman2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJeffrey Greenberg vs Tom van Alsburg6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDave Klene / Tony Delacruz vs Ryan Wither / James Dascalos4-6, 2-6
2021-05-19vs NJ GREYWon 32
W#1 DoublesMichael Gomez / Steve Cannata vs Troy Wilson / Craig Christensen7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesZac Bergquist vs Alexander Manwaring6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMichael Richmond / Brian Dino vs Wade Marquess / Jarret Sutphin6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJeffrey Greenberg vs Brett Vladika6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDamon Graham-Haradon / Tony Delacruz vs Charles Sprague / Samuel Boykin4-6, 2-6
2021-05-12vs MC GOLDWon 32
W#1 DoublesMichael Gomez / Brian Dino vs Ed Dodson / Scott Buelter6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesZac Bergquist vs Chris Duncan6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDamon Graham-Haradon / Jeffrey Greenberg vs Brad Andres / Matt Dahman6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesMichael Richmond vs Reza Esfahani2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTony Delacruz / Dave Klene vs Robert Bradley / Jonathan Stein4-6, 4-6
2021-05-05vs LTC GREENWon 32
W#1 DoublesBrian Dino / Michael Gomez vs Mike Bennett / Andrew Chasin6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMatt Whitmer vs Daniel Phan6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesZac Bergquist / Michael Richmond vs Jimmy Mountain / Aaron Hochstein6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJeffrey Greenberg vs Chris Evans6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDave Klene / Jon Mason vs Thuan Phan / Mark Teter0-6, 3-6
2021-05-04vs LTC REDWon 32
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Greenberg / Damon Graham-Haradon vs Steve Caulk / Brian Cox7-6, 6-1
W#1 SinglesZac Bergquist vs Brian Farnell6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBrian Dino / Michael Richmond vs Andrew Adams / Marvin Setzke6-0, 6-2
L#2 SinglesMatt Whitmer vs Mike Cintron4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJon Mason / Dave Klene vs Stuart Adams / John Fruit2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-04-28vs MC REDLost 14
W#1 DoublesMatt Whitmer / Michael Gomez vs Larry Middle / David Clark6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJoe Hendricks vs Dirk McDermott2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDamon Graham-Haradon / Jeffrey Greenberg vs Humberto Preciado / John Wadden3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesMichael Foonberg vs John Clements2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBrian Dino / Zac Bergquist vs Scott Hunt / Hervey Pierre3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings59 teams · MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BTA GREY703149214
2SSH GREY7031411210
3BTA ORANGE7029618267
4SSLT NAVY7026921256
5NJ BLACK6128718248
6MC RED6127821233
7SSLGT NAVY6126922225
8APR GREEN6126922261
9BM ORANGE6127824283
10CACM GREY61251025257
11NJ GREY61231232323
12GTC BLACK61211435321
13PRKR GOLD5123716208
14SSLT GREEN5123718200
15HRCA RED52221332290
16TTA RED52211435318
17KC GREEN52201536305
18BP ORANGE52181737298
19CM MAROON52191638308
20CR RED42181228273
21CACI RED42181230257
22RCC RED43171839320
23HW BLUE43191639322
24KC ORANGE43191639321
25GTC NAVY43191639338
26KC NAVY43171840326
27GLDN RED43161940300
28LTC GREEN43181742348
29HFII GREEN34191634276
30SKY SILVER34191635306
31GTC BLUE34181738319
32SSG BLUE34191638324
33SSH GREEN34122346348
34HRCA BLUE34142148341
35RRTC NAVY24121841305
36LTA RED25152041343
37KC GREY25161942313
38GAC GREY25152045335
39RHCC BLUE25161946352
40WC NAVY25142147363
41STAP BLUE25142147364
42KC BLUE25142148342
43HRCA BLACK25132249370
44EM RED25112452368
45BRMST MAROON25112453377
46CVTA BLUE25112454371
47LEBTC BLACK25102554367
48SSLT YELLOW25102558385
49SH BLUE1562448321
50MC GOLD16142146353
51BCC RED16112449351
52SKY MAROON16122349353
53KC SILVER16112451352
54WP ORANGE16112452365
55CVTA GREEN1692654362
56APR YELLOW1682759388
57CPV GREEN0652553334
58LTC RED0782757380
59NJ YELLOW0772858396

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Zac Bergquist
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
3.96
Brian Dino
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.87
Joe Hendricks
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.83
Michael Gomez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Michael Richmond
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.76
Damon Graham-Haradon
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.73
Jeffrey Greenberg
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.73
Matt Whitmer
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.38
Dave Klene
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jon Mason
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Foonberg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Steve Cannata
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tony Delacruz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Dino + Michael Richmond6263% games+8.4% vs expected
Michael Richmond + Joe Hendricks10163% games+7.5% vs expected
Jeffrey Greenberg + Damon Graham-Haradon5255% games+6.4% vs expected
Brian Dino + Damon Graham-Haradon5257% games+5.0% vs expected
Brian Dino + Michael Gomez231059% games+1.7% vs expected
Michael Gomez + Steve Cannata11359% games−0.1% vs expected
Damon Graham-Haradon + Michael Gomez4451% games−1.5% vs expected
Tony Delacruz + Jon Mason1935% games−5.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Zac Bergquist
45W–41L career · 6 lines in 2021
46%54%<1%
4.01
4
Brian Dino
61W–26L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%63%37%
3.96
Joe Hendricks
50W–28L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%84%16%
3.87
Michael Gomez
65W–46L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.83
Michael Richmond
61W–41L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Damon Graham-Haradon
28W–24L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.76
Jeffrey Greenberg
27W–19L career · 7 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
Matt Whitmer
62W–31L career · 4 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
Dave Klene
15W–23L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
3.38
Jon Mason
5W–21L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Michael Foonberg
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Steve Cannata
17W–6L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Tony Delacruz
8W–24L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.