Teams

Je.Phillips40S

2026 Capital Singles 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-04vs St.Luther40SWon 20
W#1 SinglesJennifer Ravenscraft vs Korri Styers6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesSonet Weber vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-30vs Em.Johnson40SWon 30
W#1 SinglesKATRINA SIZEMORE vs Button Hall6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesJennifer Ravenscraft vs Kimberly Patrey4-1
W#3 SinglesSonet Weber vs Emily Johnson6-1, 6-0
2026-07-15vs St.Luther40SWon 20
W#1 SinglesChristina Jenkins vs Kim Peters6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesElise Hamilton vs Korri Styers6-2, 6-2
2026-07-01vs Em.Johnson40SSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKATRINA SIZEMORE vs Kristen Boyce1-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesJennifer Kuzma vs Button Hall7-5, 6-3
2026-06-24vs St.Luther40SWon 21
L#1 SinglesJennifer Ravenscraft vs Kim Peters0-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesChristina Jenkins vs Meghan Howard5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 SinglesJennifer Kuzma vs Korri Styers6-0, 6-3
2026-06-10vs Em.Johnson40SSplit 11
L#1 SinglesJennifer Ravenscraft vs Kimberly Patrey5-7, 2-6
W#3 SinglesAnna Jane Franklin vs Christine Hughes6-3, 6-4
2026-06-03vs St.Luther40SWon 21
W#1 SinglesKATRINA SIZEMORE vs Kim Peters4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesChristina Jenkins vs Kara Rectenwald2-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesElise Hamilton vs Stephanie Luther6-3, 6-1
2026-05-20vs Em.Johnson40SWon 21
W#1 SinglesKATRINA SIZEMORE vs Emily Johnson6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesJennifer Kuzma vs Christine Hughes4-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesAnna Jane Franklin vs Erika Grenier6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Je.Phillips40S8019512137
2Em.Johnson40S34111021173
3St.Luther40S0731836223

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
KATRINA SIZEMORE
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.85
Christina Jenkins
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.83
Sonet Weber
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #3 Singles 14% · published 3.5
3.80
Jennifer Kuzma
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.75
Jennifer Ravenscraft
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.63
Elise Hamilton
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.41
Anna Jane Franklin
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
KATRINA SIZEMORE
185W–87L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
3.90
3.5
Christina Jenkins
36W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.85
3.5
Sonet Weber
48W–3L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.83
Jennifer Kuzma
66W–71L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Jennifer Ravenscraft
32W–25L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.75
3.5
Elise Hamilton
38W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%16%84%
3.63
3.5
Anna Jane Franklin
25W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
3.41

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.