Teams

Fishhawk Sweetspots - M. Eiermann

2021 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over ESL - Women · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_3

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#1 DoublesMonica Eiermann / Sheryl Schumacher vs Dena Linthicum / Meredith Vasey6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDeb Spears / Susan MOSHER vs Kelly Mamott / Carlee Revoy6-2, 6-3
2020-11-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesMary Flynn / Deb Spears vs Patricia Smith / Kim Lafferty6-1, 6-1
2020-10-19vs Fishhawk Matchmakers - D. LinthicumSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDeb Spears / Mary Flynn vs Dena Linthicum / Meredith Vasey7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMonica Eiermann / Sheryl Schumacher vs Katie Ruiz / Keiko Kato4-6, 1-6
2020-10-05vs Fishhawk MoodSwings - J. O'LearyWon 10
W#1 DoublesDeb Spears / Sheryl Schumacher vs Paula Davis / Stephane Duroseau6-3, 6-2
2020-09-28vs Palma Ceia Penn Gals - J. SawyerWon 10
W#1 DoublesDeb Spears / Mary Flynn vs Amy Corcell / Heather Elwell6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Deb Spears
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.76
Arielle Flynn
published 4
3.15
Mary Flynn
published
3.10
Sheryl Schumacher
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.95
Carrie Deming
published 3.5
2.82
Susan MOSHER
published
2.25
Dorothy Flair
published 2.5
Monica Eiermann
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sheryl Schumacher + Deb Spears213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Deb Spears
231W–146L career · 9 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Arielle Flynn
93W–34L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.76
Mary Flynn
8W–32L career · no lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Sheryl Schumacher
112W–104L career · 5 lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Carrie Deming
2W–6L career · no lines in 2021
64%36%<1%
2.95
Susan MOSHER
16W–18L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
2.82
2.5
Dorothy Flair
10W–18L career · no lines in 2021
0%97%3%
2.25
Monica Eiermann
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.