Teams

LCTA64/McElhiney/Pine Forest

LCTA 64 & Over Fall League · 64 & Over - Women 3.0

1 player · average NTRP / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings11 teams · 64 & Over - Women 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LCTA64/Parisoli/Ashborough East000000
2LCTA64/Mack-Herchak/Maybank000000
3LCTA64/Miller/Hamlin000000
4LCTA64/Portman/MPR000000
5LCTA64/Helms/Dunes West000000
6LCTA64/VAUGHN/LTPDI000000
7LCTA64/Parrott/Wild Dunes000000
8LCTA64/SANDY/Snee Farm000000
9LCTA64/CRANOR/LTPDI000000
10LCTA64/Weinstein/CTC000000
11LCTA64/McElhiney/Pine Forest000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.40 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.40
Peggy McElhiney
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Peggy McElhiney
7W–19L career · no lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
2.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.