Teams

AR/Wallman/Bella Vista

2026 Adult 70 & Over Multi-State Championship · 3.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-04-30vs LA/Boyd/Bossier CityLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoseph Miller / Jeffrey York vs Jay Boyd / Robert Burleson1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCyril Severns / Keith Faber vs Michael Doles / Alan Reger3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLou Wallman / Steve Bothwell vs Clifford Ashton / James Gilcrease0-6, 0-6
2026-04-29vs AR/Crum/NWAWon 21
L#1 DoublesWilliam Hendrix / Steve Bothwell vs Val Robison / John Bakalekos0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJeffrey York / Joseph Miller vs Danny Paskiewicz / Malcolm Hayward6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCyril Severns / Keith Faber vs Stephen Adams / Kevin McCotter6-2, 6-3
2026-04-29vs AR/Ritch/HSVWon 21
L#1 DoublesLou Wallman / Steve Bothwell vs Dan Johnson / Mickey Robertson4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJeffrey York / Joseph Miller vs William Hawkins / Bill Barnes6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKeith Faber / Cyril Severns vs Floyd Lang / Edward Barbot6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1AR/Wallman/Bella Vista40102465
2AR/Wood/LR409311116
3TX/Texas Blossoms/Vernor31102681
4AR/Dill/NLR225715114
5LA/Agin' Cajuns/Broglio226616121
6OK/Smith/Tulsa135717117
7LA/Cochran134818121
8AR/Finton/HSV134818123
9MS/Childress/Greenville134818123
10OK/Culver/Tulsa133921139

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Joseph Miller
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.85
Keith Faber
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Cyril Severns
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Steve Bothwell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.53
Jeffrey York
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Lou Wallman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
William Hendrix
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joseph Miller + Jeffrey York213 matchesnot enough data
Keith Faber + Cyril Severns303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joseph Miller
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
Keith Faber
8W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
2.85
3
Cyril Severns
7W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.81
Steve Bothwell
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.70
Jeffrey York
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
2.53
Lou Wallman
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
William Hendrix
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.