Teams

1. August

2023 Virginia Refund Holding Area · Refund Holding Area

29 players · average NTRP 3.59 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Refund Holding Area have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 27 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Erinn Burakow
published 4.5
3.94
3.88
Thomas Berray
published 4
3.80
Tara Bennett
published
3.75
3.65
Michella Newton
published
3.65
Samantha Chapman
published
3.64
Teresa Plott
published 4
3.46
Kelley Ryan
published
3.39
Paige Bartlett
published
3.37
Cristina Poli
published 3.5
3.37
Julia Foutz
published
3.30
Lisa Smithson
published
3.29
Patricia Hogan
published
3.28
Brittany Krebs
published 3.5
3.27
Kim Whittaker
published 3.5
3.27
Sibyll Jones
published 3.5
3.25
Kirsten Boyd
published
3.20
Deanne Ralston
published 3.5
3.13
Natalie Lewis
published 3.5
3.12
Kevin McKeel
published 3.5
3.09
Lisa Palmer
published
3.08
Nicholas Arcaro
published
2.77
Amelia Lovette
published 3
2.73
Elle Sullivant
published 3
2.44
Cristina Urso
published 2.5
Susan Mangin
published
Tam Banh
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Erinn Burakow
59W–69L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
4.23
4
Irina Schaffernoth
163W–100L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Thomas Berray
80W–91L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.88
Tara Bennett
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Senthil Kumar Seetharaman
170W–118L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Spoorti Dandridge
82W–62L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.75
Michella Newton
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.65
Samantha Chapman
20W–14L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.65
4
Teresa Plott
117W–93L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.64
Kelley Ryan
18W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.46
Paige Bartlett
21W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Cristina Poli
20W–29L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.37
Julia Foutz
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.37
Lisa Smithson
16W–7L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.30
Patricia Hogan
10W–7L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Brittany Krebs
99W–85L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Kim Whittaker
62W–53L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Sibyll Jones
149W–177L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Kirsten Boyd
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Deanne Ralston
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Natalie Lewis
142W–127L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Kevin McKeel
90W–97L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.12
Lisa Palmer
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
25%74%<1%
3.09
Nicholas Arcaro
15W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%30%70%
3.08
3
Amelia Lovette
21W–19L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Elle Sullivant
78W–157L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
2.5
Cristina Urso
3W–13L career · no lines in 2023
0%66%34%
2.44
Susan Mangin
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tam Banh
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.