Teams

SD LLW 4.5 La Jolla TC/ Walker

2022 Adult 40 & Over Winter - SD · SD - Women - WD 4.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.45 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-03-08Won 10
W#1 SinglesNeda Mesri vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-03-01vs SD 4.5 Peninsula TC/ Gallego (2:2)Lost 12
W#1 SinglesDorian Sailer vs Gabriela Casasus6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAdria Hilsdorf / Britney Ewing vs Kathleen Lacey / Sarah Miller6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSundi Olson / Laura Steenstra vs Darlene Gallego / Michelle May6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2022-02-22Won 20
W#1 SinglesDiane Ghiron vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSundi Olson / Laura Steenstra vs Sarah Miller / Lisa Boehnlein4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDiane Ghiron vs Carol Donahue6-3, 6-3
2022-02-01Lost 01
L#3 DoublesSundi Olson / Amy Repetti vs Sarah Miller / Gabriela Casasus2-6, 3-6
2022-01-25Won 20
W#1 SinglesDorian Sailer vs Pam Hartman6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAdria Hilsdorf / Neda Mesri vs Sarah Miller / Gabriela Casasus6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - WD 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.14 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Kellie Jaquez
published 4.5
4.33
Britney Ewing
published 4.5
4.29
Shelley Goodson
published
4.27
Laura Steenstra
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.22
Amy Repetti
published 4.5
4.20
Dorian Sailer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.16
Anna Palmer
published 4.5
4.12
Sophia Richardson
published
4.12
Adria Hilsdorf
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.07
Diane Ghiron
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
3.97
Neda Mesri
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
3.97
Sundi Olson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.74
Joni Gurrola
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Neda Mesri + Adria Hilsdorf12952% games+3.8% vs expected
Laura Steenstra + Sundi Olson683754% games+2.5% vs expected
Laura Steenstra + Anna Palmer224 matchesnot enough data
Amy Repetti + Kellie Jaquez123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Kellie Jaquez
104W–50L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
4.37
4.5
Britney Ewing
13W–8L career · type S · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
4.33
Shelley Goodson
14W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.29
4.5
Laura Steenstra
168W–92L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Amy Repetti
92W–38L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Dorian Sailer
75W–67L career · 2 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Anna Palmer
11W–19L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
4.16
Sophia Richardson
27W–31L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
4.12
4.5
Adria Hilsdorf
73W–54L career · 2 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
4.12
4.5
Diane Ghiron
100W–80L career · 2 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
4.07
4.5
Neda Mesri
96W–82L career · 2 lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
3.97
4.5
Sundi Olson
125W–128L career · 3 lines in 2022
60%40%<1%
3.97
4
Joni Gurrola
11W–11L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.