Teams

BC-LLW-MCC/KathleenStephens

2025 ADULT 18 & OVER - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.0

28 players · average NTRP 3.18 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for BC Women - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Sarah Sapiro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Julia Tuverson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Katie Ball
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.29
Corey Henkle
published 3.5
3.26
Stephanie Deur
published
Amy Singh
published 3.5
Jackie Kuehlewind
published 3.5
3.19
Janna Hahn
published
3.14
Juli Kanner
published
3.14
KARYN EILBER
published
2.99
Neeraj Rotondo
published
2.99
Erika Wadler
published 3.5
2.94
Shefali Rao
published
2.93
Serena Scott
published
2.92
Zoe Frank
published
2.91
2.86
2.85
Kathleen Stephens
published
2.83
Ashley Goldsmith
published 3
2.79
Nicole Pacourek
published
2.77
Alicia Greene
published 3
Alex Sheehan
published 3
Amy Pearce
published 3
2.69
2.55
Czarina Roxas
published 3
Kaye Heath
published
Lillian Bohannon
published
Tanya Perlmutter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Sapiro + Julia Tuverson4167% games+6.7% vs expected
Ashley Goldsmith + Alex Sheehan303 matchesnot enough data
Katie Ball + Julia Tuverson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Sapiro
13W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
Julia Tuverson
22W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.45
Katie Ball
23W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Corey Henkle
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
Stephanie Deur
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Amy Singh
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Jackie Kuehlewind
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Janna Hahn
9W–3L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Juli Kanner
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.14
KARYN EILBER
15W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.14
Neeraj Rotondo
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
3.5
Erika Wadler
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
Shefali Rao
16W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.94
Serena Scott
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%0%
2.93
Zoe Frank
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.92
Kristine Marlborough
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Elizabeth Riddell
12W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
2.86
Kathleen Stephens
3W–13L career · no lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
2.85
3
Ashley Goldsmith
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
2.83
Nicole Pacourek
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Alicia Greene
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Alex Sheehan
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Amy Pearce
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Cambria McCulloch
11W–10L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Czarina Roxas
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Kaye Heath
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lillian Bohannon
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tanya Perlmutter
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.