Teams

Miami-Dade - Crandon/Molinari

2021 Miami-Dade Mixed 18 & Over - Spring · 7.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.70 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-05-20vs Sengupta (Crandon)Split 11
W#1 DoublesIgnacio Avila / Michelle Wasserman vs Christopher Granito / Alicia Carter6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRodrigo Bermudez / Ana Pastorino vs Leonardo Concha / Margarita Nunez7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2021-05-10vs Sengupta (Crandon)Won 10
W#2 DoublesFederico Molinari / Claudia Taboada vs Schubert Sengupta / Judy Prado6-1, 6-2
2021-04-29vs Sengupta (Crandon)Won 10
W#1 DoublesClaudia Taboada / Ignacio Avila vs Robert Flowers / Silvana Larrarte6-4, 6-4
2021-04-16vs Sengupta (Crandon)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesClaudia Taboada / Federico Molinari vs Monika Olimpiew / Leonardo Concha4-6, 1-6
2021-03-19vs Sengupta (Crandon)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesFederico Molinari / Ana Pastorino vs Leonardo Concha / Monika Olimpiew2-6, 4-6
2021-03-11vs Sengupta (Crandon)Split 11
L#2 DoublesFederico Molinari / Ana Pastorino vs Christopher Granito / Margarita Nunez3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesIgnacio Avila / Lissette Viloria vs Schubert Sengupta / Monika Olimpiew6-3, 6-1
2021-02-26vs Sengupta (Crandon)Won 20
W#1 DoublesFederico Molinari / Ana Pastorino vs Leonardo Concha / Margarita Nunez5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesIgnacio Avila / Michelle Wasserman vs Florian Hafner / Monika Olimpiew6-2, 6-0
2021-02-05vs Sengupta (Crandon)Won 10
W#2 DoublesIgnacio Avila / Ana Pastorino vs Florian Hafner / Monika Olimpiew6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-01-19vs Sengupta (Crandon)Split 11
W#1 DoublesIgnacio Avila / Lissette Viloria vs Florian Hafner / Alicia Carter7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesFederico Molinari / Claudia Taboada vs Schubert Sengupta / Monika Olimpiew6-1, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Ignacio Avila
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.82
Lissette Viloria
published
3.82
Diego Mateluna
published 4
3.52
Michelle Wasserman
published
3.48
Federico Molinari
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.36
Ana Pastorino
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.14
Claudia Taboada
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Federico Molinari + Ana Pastorino1441% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ignacio Avila
121W–36L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%65%35%
3.95
Lissette Viloria
10W–6L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Diego Mateluna
2W–6L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.82
Michelle Wasserman
21W–8L career · no lines in 2021
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Federico Molinari
252W–115L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Ana Pastorino
288W–153L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Claudia Taboada
6W–11L career · no lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.