Teams

CORTA/Dayna Johnson

2023 CORTA USTA MXD 40 & Over - Summer · 6.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.17 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Shannon Galligan
published
3.40
Lynn Averett
published
3.37
Sarah Fletcher
published
3.23
Ketan Dalsania
published
3.20
Rene Roberts
published
3.17
Patrick Howard
published
3.13
Mo Duncan
published
3.09
Brandon Belisle
published 3.5
3.05
Scott Ammerman
published
3.05
Jennifer Chancey
published
3.00
Gerald Saunders
published 3.5
2.95
Dayna Johnson
published 3
2.92
Laura Dudley
published
Casey Galligan
published 3
David Roebuck
published 3
2.59
Deirdre Howard
published 3
2.59
Scott Carroll
published
2.52
Misty Carroll
published
Victoria Roebuck
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Chancey + Scott Ammerman6169% games+8.9% vs expected
Shannon Galligan + Lynn Averett15361% games+6.1% vs expected
Brandon Belisle + Patrick Howard91147% games+2.2% vs expected
Jennifer Chancey + Brandon Belisle5449% games−0.4% vs expected
Jennifer Chancey + Patrick Howard2355% games−3.7% vs expected
Misty Carroll + Scott Carroll3838% games−10.5% vs expected
Laura Dudley + Lynn Averett314 matchesnot enough data
Misty Carroll + Jennifer Chancey303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shannon Galligan
47W–25L career · no lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
3.55
Lynn Averett
55W–28L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%21%
3.40
Sarah Fletcher
42W–25L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.37
Ketan Dalsania
29W–14L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Rene Roberts
13W–5L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
Patrick Howard
76W–46L career · no lines in 2023
<1%9%91%
3.17
Mo Duncan
15W–47L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Brandon Belisle
33W–28L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.09
Scott Ammerman
72W–38L career · no lines in 2023
<1%34%66%
3.05
Jennifer Chancey
74W–53L career · no lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
3.05
3.5
Gerald Saunders
24W–15L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
3.00
3
Dayna Johnson
67W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
2.95
Laura Dudley
27W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Casey Galligan
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
David Roebuck
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Deirdre Howard
14W–23L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
2.59
Scott Carroll
4W–22L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
2.59
Misty Carroll
19W–44L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
2.52
Victoria Roebuck
19W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.