Teams

Hocus Focus

2023 One Doubles · 3.5 Women

2 players · average NTRP 3.25 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Jean Zuber Marshburn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.90
Hilary Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results7 ties
2023-08-09Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJean Zuber Marshburn / Meegan Fruits vs Ariana White / Elizabeth Schwarz6-1, 6-2
2023-07-26Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJean Zuber Marshburn / Meegan Fruits vs Rochelle Pluymers / Rebecca Griffith6-4, 7-6
2023-07-21Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMeegan Fruits / Hilary Johnson vs Colleen Kellogg / Tiffany Bowie6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-07-17Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJean Zuber Marshburn / Meegan Fruits vs Kimberly Parks / HOLLY LIBERATORE6-0, 6-1
2023-07-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesJean Zuber Marshburn / Meegan Fruits vs Catherine Greenblatt / Sarah Robertson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-06-25Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMeegan Fruits / Hilary Johnson vs Stephanie Haas / Jordan Brown2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-06-21Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJean Zuber Marshburn / Meegan Fruits vs Kalynn Belden / Cindy del Rosario6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Jean Zuber Marshburn
83W–65L career
6%94%0%
3.16
3
Hilary Johnson
68W–64L career
0%95%5%
2.90

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.