Teams

CCGA/Mary Young

2025 GIT USTA Adult 18 & Over - Winter '25 · Women's 2.5 Saturday 10am

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-23vs CCGA/Kim DelaneyWon 30
W#1 DoublesMary Young / Sara Black vs Penny Johnston / Jill Anders6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesTerri Hartridge vs LorieAnn Wright6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichelle Allan / Susan Davenport vs Meagan Jones / Mitzi Antonio6-0, 6-3
2025-03-15vs CCGA/Sally GazawayLost 12
L#1 DoublesDebra Clark / Kimberly Chitty vs Kathryn Foley / Alyssa Peterson6-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSara Black vs Sally Gazaway5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMargaret Anne Proctor / Mary Young vs Connie Bolthouse / Amber Carter6-1, 6-1
2025-02-22vs CCGA/Kim DelaneySplit 11
W#1 DoublesKimberly Chitty / Sara Black vs Sue Cole / Kim Delaney6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJoanne Kinsey / Michelle Allan vs Lynn Cody / Meagan Jones5-7, 2-6
2025-02-08vs CCGA/Sally GazawayWon 30
W#1 DoublesKimberly Chitty / Debra Clark vs Amber Carter / Kathryn Foley6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesSara Black vs Sally Gazaway6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSusan Davenport / Margaret Anne Proctor vs Elizabeth Goodroe / Alyssa Peterson6-2, 6-4
2025-01-25vs CCGA/Kim DelaneyWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary Young / Michelle Allan vs Theresa Johnson / Kim Delaney6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesSara Black vs Meagan Jones6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJoanne Kinsey / Kristin Harrison vs Penny Johnston / Sue Cole2-6, 3-6
2025-01-14vs CCGA/Sally GazawayLost 01
L#1 SinglesKimberly Chitty vs Kathryn Foley2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 2.5 Saturday 10am have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.13 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.33
Michelle Allan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.28
Sara Black
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Debra Clark
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.24
Kimberly Chitty
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
1.67
Joanne Kinsey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Margaret Anne Proctor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Terri Hartridge
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Allan
7W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%89%11%
2.33
Sara Black
7W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.28
2.5
Debra Clark
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kimberly Chitty
10W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.24
Joanne Kinsey
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.67
Margaret Anne Proctor
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Terri Hartridge
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.