Teams

ACAC-Simon/Donnelly

2024 Charlottesville Tri-Level 18 & Over · Charlottesville Tri-Level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.75 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-09-22vs Farmington-WorthLost 01
L#3 DoublesAnn Hague / Kathleen Kariel vs Loring Woodriff / Courtney Sievers1-6, 0-6
2024-09-10vs ACAC-BaylissLost 01
L#3 DoublesAnn Hague / Danielle Coccomo vs Christina Meyer / Samantha Bates2-6, 3-6
2024-09-03vs Glenmore Green-LongLost 01
L#3 DoublesAnn Hague / Danielle Coccomo vs Christine Faulkner / Nerissa Rouzer2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Tri-Level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Kelli Wood
published
2.64
Diane Simon
published 3
2.35
Danielle Coccomo
published 2.5
2.11
Ann Hague
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.11
Wendi Cook
published
Kathleen Kariel
published
Martha Donnelly
published
Rachael Day
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelli Wood
11W–17L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
3
Diane Simon
8W–14L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%<1%
2.64
3
Beverly Scruggs Randall
7W–24L career · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
2.51
2.5
Danielle Coccomo
6W–17L career · no lines in 2024
0%88%12%
2.35
2.5
Ann Hague
27W–66L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Wendi Cook
7W–13L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Kathleen Kariel
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Martha Donnelly
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rachael Day
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.