Teams

Wilson 7.5 40+

2023 South East Tennis Combo League 40 & OVER · Womens 7.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-10-18vs Brandkamp 7.5 40+Won 10
W#1 DoublesKate Fortun / Tracie McCabe vs Ashley Doyle / Hope Conway6-3, 7-5
2023-10-15vs Lee - LeitchWon 10
W#1 DoublesKate Fortun / Tracie McCabe vs Cindy Antonelli / Jean Murtagh6-1, 7-5
2023-09-25vs Glancy 7.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesKris Summers / Tracie McCabe vs Cara Foucht / Genevieve Hansler6-3, 6-2
2023-09-19vs Eshelman/MartinWon 10
W#1 DoublesTracie McCabe / Kate Fortun vs Jenna Butler / Lorien Lamar6-4, 6-2
2023-08-22vs Morgan 40+ 7.5 2023Won 10
W#1 DoublesKate Fortun / Tracie McCabe vs Lara Hanks / Terry Thompkins6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Womens 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Elizabeth Claus
published 4
3.91
Tracie McCabe
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.91
Loretta Lestrange
published
3.79
Lynn Norris
published
3.74
Laurie Sullivan
published
3.73
Kate Fortun
published
3.46
Katie Cerrone
published
3.40
Kris Summers
published
3.20
Evelyn Foster
published 3.5
Laura Gangeme
published
Linda Wilson
published
Sara Borcherding
published
Valerie Schaffer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracie McCabe + Laurie Sullivan3641% games−3.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elizabeth Claus
37W–23L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%32%
3.94
4
Tracie McCabe
279W–99L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.91
Loretta Lestrange
11W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.91
Lynn Norris
9W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.79
Laurie Sullivan
17W–8L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.74
Kate Fortun
10W–3L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
Katie Cerrone
26W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.46
Kris Summers
34W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Evelyn Foster
28W–20L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
Laura Gangeme
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Linda Wilson
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sara Borcherding
13W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Valerie Schaffer
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.