Teams

MC McCotter FWL A18-3.5WW

2022 WMI FWL USTA League Adult 18&Over Weekend Leagues · WMI FWL A18&O 3.5 WW (8 player)

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-01-22vs PA Avery FWL A18-3.5WWLost 12
W#1 DoublesCatherine Wilcox / Sarah Abramson vs Elizabeth Patrick / Carrita Plaskewicz6-1, 7-5
L#1 SinglesToni Whaley vs Glyde King0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Gilmer / Lisa Ryan vs Tracy Sodini / Volita Vinoski4-6, 3-6
2022-01-08vs MVS Rose FWL A18-3.5WWSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSarah Abramson / Catherine Wilcox vs Margaret Steketee / Beth Balon4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAmanda Muck vs Mary White1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesRita Sharma / Karen Hoffman vs Emily MacK / Amy Stevens6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesToni Whaley / Amy Gilmer vs Gretchen Townshend / Susan Richardson6-2, 6-1
2021-12-11vs PA Johnson FWL A18-3.5WWLost 04
L#1 DoublesSarah Abramson / Catherine Wilcox vs Sara Johnson / Ruth Kohley4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAmanda Muck vs Pauline Unfried3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAngee Neagle / Lisa Ryan vs Mary Burdo / Suzette Adams3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesToni Whaley vs Andrea Skidmore0-6, 2-6
2021-11-14vs MVC Kloet FWL A18-3.5WWLost 12
W#1 DoublesKaren Hoffman / Sarah Abramson vs Brenda Bezinque / Nancy Joure7-5, 5-6
L#1 SinglesToni Whaley vs Luann Mullen2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAngee Neagle / Cindy Anderson vs Pam Kloet / Samantha Keith1-6, 0-6
2021-11-13vs WH Holmgren FWL A18-3.5WWLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmanda Muck / Sarah Abramson vs Heather Ballines / Sandy Doroh5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesToni Whaley vs Carmen Harris4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCindy Anderson / Amy Gilmer vs Miranda Garside / Eva Lieberman2-6, 1-6
2021-10-30vs WH Schulman FWL A18-3.5WWWon 21
W#1 DoublesCatherine Wilcox / Sarah Abramson vs Jana Schulman / Mary Peterson4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesToni Whaley vs Erika Rozema1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAmanda Muck / Amy Gilmer vs Julie Benes / Martina Wisser6-1, 6-4
2021-10-23vs MY Sullivan FWL A18-3.5WWWon 32
W#1 DoublesCatherine Wilcox / Amanda Muck vs Yvette Diamondidis / Alisha Marvin7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAngee Neagle vs Beth Batts6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesRita Sharma / Karen Hoffman vs Patricia Randall / Shawn Arcangeli2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesToni Whaley vs Stella Chivikas1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCindy Anderson / Amy Gilmer vs Donna Weber / Jinny Ahrens6-1, 6-2
2021-10-16vs MSU Pavlat FWL A18-3.5WWLost 12
L#1 DoublesCatherine Wilcox / Sarah Abramson vs Julie Ludden / Erin Burns7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesToni Whaley vs Isabella Morris1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCarol Simmons / Amy Gilmer vs Sarah Eyde / Carolinne Ogura6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WMI FWL A18&O 3.5 WW (8 player) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Sarah Abramson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Amy Gilmer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.86
Toni Whaley
usually #2 Singles 47%, also #1 Singles 47% · published
Cindy Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.64
Rita Sharma
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Amanda Muck
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Angee Neagle
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Carol Simmons
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Catherine Wilcox
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Hoffman
published
Lisa Ryan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Anderson + Amy Gilmer5355% gamesnot enough data
Sarah Abramson + Catherine Wilcox2352% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Abramson
79W–117L career · 7 lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
Amy Gilmer
40W–32L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Toni Whaley
37W–56L career · 15 lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
2.86
3
Cindy Anderson
28W–43L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rita Sharma
29W–44L career · 2 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
2.64
Amanda Muck
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Angee Neagle
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Carol Simmons
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Catherine Wilcox
3W–3L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen Hoffman
39W–46L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Ryan
0W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.