Teams

Hasling 40/6.5/M/Francos

2025 Man · Cov Southern Combo 40 & Over - Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.33 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-22Won 10
W#2 DoublesJason Bragg / Amintas Major vs Mark Rolling / David LeBreton6-3, 6-2
2025-10-08vs Cuevas-Catt 40/6.5/M/PelicanLost 02
L#1 DoublesJason Bragg / Fred Miller vs Keith Laterrade / Mark Mills3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJody Harper / Amintas Major vs Derek Haney / Erik Ernst2-6, 2-6
2025-10-04Won 10
W#2 DoublesJames Tickner / Amintas Major vs Alexander Mata Iv / Alan Schluter6-3, 6-4
2025-10-01Won 10
W#1 DoublesJason Bragg / Amintas Major vs Aaron Sinclair / Cody Westmoreland7-5, 6-3
2025-09-17Won 10
W#2 DoublesJason Bragg / Klint Beckendorf vs Douglas Dillon / Jason Ortis3-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Cov Southern Combo 40 & Over - Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Cuevas-Catt 40/6.5/M/Pelican8019514158
2Parvizian-40/6.5/M/StoneCreek5315919161
3Hasling 40/6.5/M/Francos5315921172
4Ortis-Schluter 40/6.5/M/Pelican2651941264
5Griffin 40/6.5//M/N Cypress0851941263

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
David Bachemin
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.29
Bryan Quarls
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published 3.5
3.15
James Tickner
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Bill Bass
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 42% · published 3.5
3.00
Amintas Major
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.72
Adam Scarbrough
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.55
Jody Harper
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published
Jason Bragg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
John Shylock
usually #1 Doubles 48%, also #2 Singles 15% · published
Kenny Wollfarth
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published
Klint Beckendorf
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #1 Singles 28% · published
Randy Hasling
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 45% · published
Robert Barrosse
usually #3 Doubles 48%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Timothy Hoy
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published
Yi Xiong
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #1 Singles 15% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Shylock + Amintas Major7360% gamesnot enough data
David Bachemin + Kenny Wollfarth4348% gamesnot enough data
James Tickner + Kenny Wollfarth134 matchesnot enough data
Bill Bass + Kenny Wollfarth134 matchesnot enough data
Timothy Hoy + Randy Hasling134 matchesnot enough data
James Tickner + Bill Bass033 matchesnot enough data
James Tickner + Bryan Quarls123 matchesnot enough data
Bill Bass + Timothy Hoy213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Bachemin
13W–14L career · 14 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
Bryan Quarls
11W–13L career · 12 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
James Tickner
16W–23L career · 24 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Bill Bass
17W–22L career · 19 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Amintas Major
16W–8L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Adam Scarbrough
14W–33L career · 21 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
2.72
Jody Harper
12W–46L career · 24 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Jason Bragg
4W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
John Shylock
39W–31L career · 36 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kenny Wollfarth
17W–23L career · 23 lines in 2025
not enough data
Klint Beckendorf
16W–10L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Randy Hasling
14W–27L career · 20 lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert Barrosse
14W–18L career · 21 lines in 2025
not enough data
Timothy Hoy
13W–25L career · 18 lines in 2025
not enough data
Yi Xiong
17W–16L career · 25 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.