Teams

2-SSmith-HVCC-18+ 6.5

2022 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · Eno River 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Day

9 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-09-23vs 3-OStephens/DErwin - EnoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAmy Herman / Betsy Euler vs Dianna Erwin / Hope Graney7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKristen Ingle / Kelly Moore vs Julie Brigham / Salley Huff1-6, 2-6
2022-09-16vs 1-NGagnon-EnoWon 20
W#1 DoublesKelly Moore / Betsy Euler vs Colleen Derks / Linda Kearns6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKristen Ingle / Hadley Nixon vs Karin Campbell / Rhonda Kaspar7-6, 7-6
2022-09-13vs 3-OStephens/DErwin - EnoLost 01
L#1 DoublesKelly Moore / Betsy Euler vs Caroline Fungaroli / Olga Stephens1-6, 1-6
2022-09-02vs 3-OStephens/DErwin - EnoLost 02
L#1 DoublesBetsy Euler / Joanie Preyer vs Anna Jones / Kelly Townsend4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKristen Ingle / Hadley Nixon vs Christine Burr / Heather Roberts2-6, 2-6
2022-08-26vs 1-NGagnon-EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristen Ingle / Kelly Moore vs Holly Haney / Nicole Gagnon4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-08-05vs 1-NGagnon-EnoLost 01
L#2 DoublesHadley Nixon / Kate Barron vs Angki Sager / Dawn Losito4-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Amy Herman
published 3.5
3.24
Hadley Nixon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Kristen Ingle
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.09
Melanie Biese
published
3.06
Betsy Euler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.95
Joanie Preyer
published
2.88
Lauren Powell
published
2.69
Elizabeth Albright
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melanie Biese + Kristen Ingle5547% games+5.0% vs expected
Lauren Powell + Hadley Nixon2443% games−3.1% vs expected
Hadley Nixon + Kristen Ingle4351% gamesnot enough data
Betsy Euler + Kristen Ingle4254% gamesnot enough data
Joanie Preyer + Hadley Nixon314 matchesnot enough data
Betsy Euler + Hadley Nixon044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy Herman
29W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%21%79%
3.60
3.5
Hadley Nixon
77W–65L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Kristen Ingle
60W–44L career · 4 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Melanie Biese
19W–23L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.09
3
Betsy Euler
140W–108L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%32%68%
3.06
Joanie Preyer
20W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
2.95
Lauren Powell
12W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Elizabeth Everett
13W–37L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
Elizabeth Albright
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.