Teams

TCU CHRISTIANSON

2026 FW Adult 40 & Over League - Men 40 Winter · 4.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-07vs HTC DUNCANWon 30
W#1 DoublesScott Christianson / Nicolas Hutnyak vs Shane Allred / Franklin Friday0-1
W#1 SinglesVictor Munoz vs Matt Duncan0-1
W#2 DoublesFrank Edwards / John Horton vs Wally Devereaux / Taylor Foreman0-1
2026-02-28vs HS TRIVITTWon 31
L#1 DoublesScott Christianson / Rafael Velez vs Larry Gendron / Steve Todd7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesShawn Wooley vs Joseph Miller6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesScott Howell / Victor Munoz vs Brent Giesler / Brady Giesler3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesWade Morgan / Justin Brammer vs Curtis Trivitt / Philip Dizack6-2, 6-2
2026-02-25vs BIR HLUCHANWon 31
W#1 DoublesScott Christianson / Justin Brammer vs Brandon Becicka / Bradley Tidwell7-5, 6-3
L#1 SinglesRafael Velez vs Randall White3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesShawn Wooley / Jomar Candelaria vs Brian Booth / Christopher Puntureri7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesScott Howell / Victor Munoz vs Steven Hluchan / Daniel Beres6-3, 6-1
2026-02-07vs CCC DEEMWon 31
L#1 DoublesScott Howell / James Cole vs Michael Mabe / Terry Traylor5-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesRafael Velez vs Marcus Kerr6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesVictor Munoz / Jomar Candelaria vs Lionel Girolet / Scott Stidham7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesScott Christianson / Wade Morgan vs Mel McRee / John Fisher6-4, 6-1
2026-02-03vs HTC DUNCANWon 21
W#1 DoublesScott Howell / Wade Morgan vs Franklin Friday / Terry Coffman6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJustin Brammer vs Matt Duncan7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesScott Christianson / Rafael Velez vs Mel Shepherd / Garold LaRue6-0, 6-1
2026-01-24vs HS TRIVITTLost 03
L#1 DoublesScott Christianson / Frank Edwards vs Slavko Djukic / Brian Redding3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesShawn Wooley vs Steve Todd6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesVictor Munoz / Travis Satterfield vs Brent Giesler / Brady Giesler3-6, 2-6
2026-01-17vs BIR HLUCHANSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJustin Brammer / Nicolas Hutnyak vs Andy Alexander / Brandon Becicka2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesScott Christianson vs Randall White2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesVictor Munoz / Rafael Velez vs Steven Hluchan / Christopher Puntureri7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTravis Satterfield / Jomar Candelaria vs Cory Trotter / Duane Bacon3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-01-03vs CCC DEEMLost 04
L#1 DoublesFrank Edwards / Scott Howell vs Adam Deem / Matthew Watson6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesScott Christianson vs Michael Mabe2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJames Cole / Nicolas Hutnyak vs Lionel Girolet / Rafael Omana3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesVictor Munoz / Travis Satterfield vs Michael Kelly / Terry Traylor2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 4.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CCC DEEM7127514189
2BIR HLUCHAN53171532255
3TCU CHRISTIANSON53181432257
4HS TRIVITT35131942289
5HTC DUNCAN0842859370

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.08 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.53
Scott Howell
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
4.38
Rafael Velez
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
4.30
Scott Christianson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
4.25
Nicolas Hutnyak
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.15
Shawn Wooley
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.08
Justin Brammer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.08
Frank Edwards
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.95
Wade Morgan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.88
Victor Munoz
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.83
Jomar Candelaria
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.45
Travis Satterfield
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
John Horton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Christianson + Rafael Velez314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Scott Howell
10W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
4.53
Rafael Velez
7W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
4.38
Scott Christianson
10W–5L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
4.30
Nicolas Hutnyak
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
4.25
Shawn Wooley
15W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
4.15
Justin Brammer
12W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
28%71%<1%
4.08
Frank Edwards
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
4.08
Wade Morgan
10W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
3.95
Victor Munoz
15W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
3.88
Jomar Candelaria
4W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
89%11%<1%
3.83
Travis Satterfield
2W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
3.45
John Horton
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.