Teams

Sarff - Highland CC

2023 Sandhills Summer Singles Adult 18 & over · 3.0 Adult Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-07vs Zumwalt - MazarickWon 10
W#2 SinglesCharlotte Hasty vs LaJune Ray6-1, 6-2
2023-09-05vs Zumwalt - MazarickLost 02
L#2 SinglesLindsay Sarff vs LaJune Ray5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 SinglesMaria Fulcher vs Marcela Ovalle3-6, 6-7
2023-08-22vs Zumwalt - MazarickWon 21
W#1 SinglesCharlotte Hasty vs LaJune Ray6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesAlex Hammill vs Samantha Zumwalt4-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesLindsay Sarff vs Lydia Apollo6-4, 6-3
2023-08-08vs Zumwalt - MazarickSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAlex Hammill vs LaJune Ray5-7, 6-7
W#3 SinglesCharlotte Hasty vs Karla Bullon6-1, 6-0
2023-08-01vs Zumwalt - MazarickSplit 11
L#1 SinglesLaurie Cherry vs Samantha Zumwalt3-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesMaria Fulcher vs Heather Sisk6-1, 6-0
2023-07-26vs Zumwalt - MazarickWon 21
L#1 SinglesMaria Fulcher vs LaJune Ray1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesAlex Hammill vs Yuko Resseguie6-4, 6-5
W#3 SinglesLindsay Sarff vs Heather Sisk6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Lindsay Sarff
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Alex Hammill
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Maria Fulcher
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Charlotte Hasty
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Julia McDonald
published
2.96
Laurie Cherry
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.91
Jennifer Fincher
published
2.77
Meagan Lee
published
Caroline Hasty
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindsay Sarff + Maria Fulcher314 matchesnot enough data
Julia McDonald + Lindsay Sarff213 matchesnot enough data
Lindsay Sarff + Alex Hammill123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lindsay Sarff
71W–54L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%61%38%
3.46
3.5
Alex Hammill
43W–35L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Maria Fulcher
44W–29L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Charlotte Hasty
54W–19L career · 3 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
Julia McDonald
18W–17L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.06
3
Laurie Cherry
93W–106L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%60%40%
2.96
Jennifer Fincher
18W–26L career · no lines in 2023
73%27%<1%
2.91
Meagan Lee
12W–17L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Caroline Hasty
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.