Teams

Liberty Park-Jones/Moreton

2023 Fall Indoor League-Weekday · 4.0W

14 players · average NTRP 3.78 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-12-14Won 10
W#1 Female DoublesDebi Johnson / Berit Campion vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-12-07vs Salt Lake Tennis-RasmussenSplit 22
L#1 Female DoublesJulie Jones / Jennifer Moreton vs Jan Chamberlain / Elizabeth Michie3-6, 3-6
W#1 Female SinglesBerit Campion vs Angela Rasmussen6-1, 6-2
W#2 Female DoublesAimee Nilson / Debi Johnson vs DeeAnn Henderson / Bleecker Springs3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 Female DoublesSusan Knight / Kimberly Holmstrom vs Karen Nickolaisen / Ingrid Hansen2-6, 2-6
2023-11-30vs Wasatch Rec Center-Berg/HronekLost 03
L#1 Female DoublesJanice Stokes-Burns / Aimee Nilson vs Deyce Peterson / Mandy Berg3-6, 2-6
L#1 Female SinglesBerit Campion vs Amber Greenwood0-6, 5-4, 0-1
L#2 Female DoublesJennifer Moreton / Shauna Lake vs Ann Hronek / Carly Reese2-6, 1-6
2023-11-16vs Sunpro-Warren/CarterLost 12
L#1 Female SinglesBerit Campion vs Sarah Alton3-6, 1-0, 0-1
W#2 Female DoublesJanice Stokes-Burns / Julie Jones vs Linda Fillmore / Tiffany Pierce1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 Female DoublesKimberly Holmstrom / Allison Leishman vs Michelle Fowkes / Jennifer Napierski3-6, 3-6
2023-11-09vs Liberty Park Tennis-Young/SwensenLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesJanice Stokes-Burns / Aimee Nilson vs Amy Earl / Alisa Gardner3-6, 0-6
2023-11-02vs Cottonwood Club-Briesacher/GardnerLost 02
L#1 Female DoublesJennifer Moreton / Cassandra Suite-Smith vs Lisa Hakes / Holli Turner3-6, 3-6
L#2 Female DoublesJulie Jones / Janice Stokes-Burns vs Lois Peterson / Kathy Miller-Rees2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 4.0W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RISE AC-Glines6017719179
2Liberty Park Tennis-Young/Swensen5117718188
3Wasatch Rec Center-Berg/Hronek5117720167
4Cottonwood Club-Briesacher/Gardner4218616161
5Sports Mall-Affleck42141025199
6Sunpro-Blackhurst/Mayberry3315924186
7Sunpro-Warren/Carter33101431196
8Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/Brooks24101433225
9Ivory Ridge-Holland/Jarvie24101433227
10Sunpro-Leishman/Mortensen1561837227
11Salt Lake Tennis-Rasmussen1551939252
12Liberty Park-Jones/Moreton0651941246

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Jennifer Moreton
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #2 Female Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Debi Johnson
published 4
3.54
Berit Campion
usually #1 Female Singles 75%, also #1 Female Doubles 25% · published 4
3.49
3.48
Aimee Nilson
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #2 Female Doubles 33% · published 4
3.38
Rachel Mills
published
3.27
Janice Stokes-Burns
usually #2 Female Doubles 50%, also #1 Female Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Ann Trentman
usually #2 Female Doubles 50%, also #1 Female Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Kimberly Holmstrom
usually #3 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Allison Leishman
usually #3 Female Doubles 60%, also #1 Female Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Nicole Cramer
published
Sandy Adamson
published
Shauna Lake
published
Susan Knight
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Trentman + Rachel Mills2349% games+12.8% vs expected
Shauna Lake + Allison Leishman0537% games+3.0% vs expected
Ann Trentman + Allison Leishman4443% games+1.9% vs expected
Kimberly Holmstrom + Shauna Lake3548% games−2.0% vs expected
Rachel Mills + Shauna Lake2739% games−2.8% vs expected
Sandy Adamson + Nicole Cramer5447% games−3.4% vs expected
Jennifer Moreton + Cassandra Suite-Smith71345% games−4.2% vs expected
Susan Knight + Ann Trentman21437% games−5.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jennifer Moreton
103W–122L career · 3 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.60
4
Debi Johnson
139W–69L career · no lines in 2023
28%71%<1%
3.58
4
Berit Campion
104W–139L career · 4 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.54
4
Cassandra Suite-Smith
44W–54L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
3.49
4
Aimee Nilson
53W–119L career · 3 lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
3.48
Rachel Mills
72W–103L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Janice Stokes-Burns
132W–134L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Ann Trentman
185W–245L career · 4 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Kimberly Holmstrom
49W–73L career · 2 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.08
3.5
Allison Leishman
132W–209L career · 5 lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.07
Nicole Cramer
19W–33L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sandy Adamson
34W–60L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Shauna Lake
134W–131L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Knight
34W–73L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.